Laserfiche WebLink
as well as the equipment. Overhead includes such costs as <br />insurance, data processing, and billing. <br />The number of truck and trailer rigs required for haul between <br />a transfer station and a landfill is based on estimated travel <br />times, load and unload times, and an average trailer capacity <br />of 90 loose cubic yards per load. Vehicle capital costs <br />include one backup unit. Vehicle operation and maintenance <br />costs include fuel, oil, tires, and maintenance and were <br />computed on the basis of total annual mileage. <br />Existing Transfer Station and Transfer Vehicles. The facility <br />cost for the existing California Waste Removal Systems <br />transfer station was assumed to remain the same for all <br />alternatives. In other words, the facility is assumed to be <br />able to handle any increased traffic resulting from changes in <br />individual and other nonfranchised commercial trip patterns <br />without any modification. <br />The forecasted 1990 waste volumes handled by the California <br />Waste Removal Systems were based on 1990 waste forecasts and <br />adjusted by assumed destination of public and other commercial <br />haulers, as discussed above. The waste volumes used are as <br />follows: <br />Alternative <br />A.1 <br />444,000 <br />cu <br />yd/yr <br />Alternative,A.2 <br />337,000 <br />cu <br />yd/yr <br />Alternative <br />C.1 <br />487,000 <br />cu <br />yd/yr <br />Alternative <br />C.2 <br />348,000 <br />cu <br />yd/yr <br />Alternative <br />D.1 <br />399,000 <br />cu <br />yd/yr <br />Alternative <br />D.2 <br />333,000 <br />cu <br />yd/yr <br />The above waste volumes differ from the 1990 projected value <br />of 304,000 cu yd/yr, based on current volume, for the present <br />service area. The differences between this 304,000 figure and <br />the A.1, C.1, and D.1 volumes are due to projected increased <br />use by public and other commercial haulers from much of the <br />M <br />