Laserfiche WebLink
Franchised Collector Costs. As previously mentioned, <br />none of the alternatives would affect collection and haul <br />costs of the Lodi City franchisee, since the Lodi City e <br />franchisee would always use the California Waste Removal <br />Systems transfer station. However, if the county franchisee <br />also used the California Waste Removal Systems transfer <br />station in all alternatives and was charged the same disposal <br />fee as at all landfills, the county franchisee's collection <br />and haul costs would be reduced to essentially the same as <br />Alternative A.1 or A.2. As shown in Table 7, the cost <br />reductions to County franchisee would be greatest for <br />Alternatives C.1 and D.1, since direct haul to distant <br />landfills would be eliminated. However, overall cost <br />reductions are not significant. <br />Service Area. As previously discussed, several cost <br />items were based on facilities having specific service <br />areas. Public and other commercial hauler costs were based on <br />cost of haul to the nearest facility. This also affected <br />transfer haul cost. If facility service areas are established <br />in different ways, collection and transfer costs would change. <br />One extreme case would be to assume direct haul to landfills <br />only, except for the Lodi City franchisee which would continue <br />to use the California Waste Removal Systems transfer <br />station. This could occur in the unlikely event that the <br />California Waste Removal Systems transfer station is not open <br />to the public and the Eight Mile Road transfer station is not <br />built. In this case, costs of Alternatives A.1, C.1, and D.1 <br />only would be affected, because if the Eight Mile Road <br />transfer station is not built, Alternatives A.2, C.2, and D.2 <br />do not apply. <br />R1 <br />