Laserfiche WebLink
Costs for alternatives are affected in two ways: <br />(1) increased public and other commercial collection and haul <br />costs, because of longer haul distances to landfills; and <br />(2) decreased transfer and haul costs, because of reduced use <br />of the California Waste Removal Systems transfer station. The <br />increases and decreases are as follows. <br />Public and <br />other commercial <br />haul cost, $1000/yr <br />Revised <br />Alter- service Increase <br />native Table 4 area (Table 7) <br />Transfer and haul cost, <br />California Waste <br />Removal Svstems, $1000/yr <br />Revised <br />service Decrease <br />Table 4 area (Table 7) <br />A.1 577 901 324 416 372 44 <br />C.1 612 1,551 939 566 443 123 <br />D.1 480 1,057 577 467 410 57 <br />The total costs after the increases and decreases are shown in <br />Table 7. <br />For all alternatives, public and other commercial collection <br />and haul cost increases are much greater than transfer and <br />haul cost decreases. The net cost increase is most dramatic <br />in Alternative C.1, use of Foothill Landfill, as shown above <br />and in Table 7. Under these circumstances, use of Foothill <br />Landfill is more costly than other alternatives. <br />SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br />The two basic alternatives to the Harney Lane Landfill <br />replacement site are use of the Foothill Landfill and use of <br />the proposed central county landfill. Variations of these <br />alternatives include construction of a transfer station on <br />Eight Mile Road at Highway 99. <br />