My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1981
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
17720
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440058
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 2:16:11 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:00:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1981
RECORD_ID
PR0440058
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004518
FACILITY_NAME
NORTH COUNTY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
17720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06512004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17720 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
CField
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440058_17720 E HARNEY_1981.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />from the south end of the site could drain southerly into Mosher Creek. No <br />significant fish populations are known to occur in Mosher Creek. <br />The California Department of Fish and Game was consulted to inquire <br />about their concerns and to request their recommendations to mitigate potential <br />impacts. Staff responsible for wildlife management indicated that no unusual <br />conditions occur at the site relative to wildlife and that a typical micro-. <br />fauna of rodents and rabbits would be expected. While the proposed landfill <br />operation would displace or eliminate the resident wildlife population this <br />was not considered significant relative to the perpetuation of any wildlife <br />species. <br />Similarly, no concern for fisheries was expressed as a result of the <br />proposed landfill operation. This is due to the distance between the landfill <br />site and the Delta (17 to 18 miles) and the absence of an intermediate water- <br />way supporting a significant fish population. It was further stated that a <br />properly designed and operated landfill site should not allow significant <br />amounts of leachate to escape from the site. <br />No rare or endangered species of fish or wildlife are known to occur <br />within the sphere of influence of the proposed site. <br />General Plan and Zoning <br />The current 1995 General Plan for San Joaquin County designates the site <br />of the proposed landfill to be for agricultural uses. The surrounding property <br />is also designated as agricultural. The current zoning of the site is GA -40, <br />General Agriculture with a minimum parcel size of 40 acres. Permitted uses <br />in this zoning category include grading and excavation, and borrow sites, <br />under certain conditions. The site is not included in the Williamson Act, <br />according to legal counsel for San Joaquin County. <br />Population <br />Development of the proposed landfill will have no effect upon population <br />growth or distribution within San Joaquin County. Landfills are not population <br />generating projects such as residential developments and therefore have no <br />direct effect on population growth. The proposed site is located in an area <br />of the County generally limited to large parcel sizes and varying agricultural <br />uses, and insertion of a landfill is considered to be neither a stimulant nor <br />a deterrent to area shifts in population location. <br />This landfill, as with any landfill operation, may have an indirect effect <br />upon population location as it relates to the disposal of solid waste. Should <br />this site not be developed, and should no alternative site be developed or ex- <br />panded, then the County would soon face the prospect of having solid waste dis- <br />posal facilities inadequate to meet the needs of its population. In such an <br />event, the County would have to consider disincentives for solid waste genera- <br />tion, and could potentially need to curtail residential development. This, as <br />a worst case scenario, would effectively reduce population growth in the County. <br />7 , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.