Laserfiche WebLink
composition of this gaseous mixture. However, limited studies of earlier land- <br />fill operations indicate that under ideal conditions, each pound of refuse <br />could, theoretically, generate up to seven cubic feet'of gas consisting mainly <br />of methane (CH4) and carbon Dioxide (CO2) and lesser amounts of nitrogen, hydro- <br />gen, argon, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and complex hydrogen gases. However, in <br />real situations the total amount of gas generated could be as little as three <br />to four cubic feet due to incomplete decomposition. The studies further indi- <br />cate that on the average, three months after solid wastes were placed in fill, <br />(CO2) accounted for approximately 88 percent and (CH4) five percent of the mix- <br />ture. Whereas, four years later, the ratios shifted 51 percent for (CO2) and <br />48 percent for (CH4). The rate of gas production appears to range from 0.1 to <br />0.6 cubic feet per pound of refuse per year with a commonly used "rule of thumb" <br />value of 0.16 cubic feet per pound per year. This could continue for up to 100 <br />years. Figure 8 illustrates, in principle, decomposition gas production and <br />composition as related to time. <br />As decomposition gas is produced, it exits the landfill either upward <br />through the landfill surface or it migrates horizontally or downward into <br />the surrounding soils. It is anticipated that most gas produced at the proposed <br />site would harmlessly enter the atmosphere through the surface. <br />In order to qualify the significance of decomposition gas production, it <br />should be noted that these gases have been produced for millions of years by <br />natural decomposition processes. There also exists within our ecosystem <br />natural, bio -chemical processes which recycle these gases to "purify" our <br />atmosphere and maintain background concentrations at their present levels. <br />These gases occur naturally within our atmosphere and become a hazard only <br />when they are not allowed to disperse and are permitted to accumulate and <br />concentrate to many times that of their natural background concentrations. <br />For example, hydrogen sulfide gas (H2S), which can be extremely toxic at high <br />concentrations of 600 to 900 parts per million (ppm), is reduced to no more <br />than an odor nuisance (odor of rotten eggs) at .07 ppm. Based on monitoring <br />data from other landfill operations, it is anticipated that atmospheric con- <br />centrations of (H2S) would never exceed .006 ppm anywhere within the study area. <br />Methane (CH4) is of particular concern since it can be explosive under certain <br />conditions. There have been a number of cases where methane gas, escaping <br />through surface cracks at a landfill site, has been ignited. There have also <br />been cases of flash fires occurring in the basement of homes and various other <br />subterranean structures adjacent to landfill sites. Natural gas, which has <br />been used for cooking and heating for decades, is nearly pure methane gas. <br />As unknown amount of dust may be produced at the proposed landfill site, <br />but it is not anticipated to be a significant amount. Presently, the site is <br />used for grazing cattle, and surrounding land uses are agricultural in nature <br />as well. Consequently, to some degree, dust production is a problem common to <br />all lands in the general area. If properly operated by periodically sprinkling <br />as appropriate to control dust, the landfill should not generate dust signifi- <br />cantly different from that created by the current use of the site. <br />The potential for a nuisance odor problem is, again, dependent upon the <br />operation of the landfill facility. If the daily soil cover is applied to <br />J <br />