My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1981
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
1831
>
PR0440058
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 2:16:11 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:00:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1981
RECORD_ID
PR0440058
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004518
FACILITY_NAME
NORTH COUNTY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
17720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06512004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17720 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
CField
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440058_17720 E HARNEY_1981.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Incineration with heat recovery has been extensively developed in <br />both Europe and the United States. <br />In the United States, the cities of Saugus, Massachusetts; Chicago, <br />Illinois; Nashville, Tennessee; and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, currently <br />utilize large steam producing combustion systems to dispose of their solid <br />wastes. Systems are in construction or undergoing start-up in Niagara Falls, <br />New York; Akron, Ohio; Pinellas County, Florida; and Tacoma, Washington. <br />Air emissions control systems for modern incinerators are considerably <br />more sophisticated than the earlier incinerators. High efficiency electro- <br />static precipitators are commonly used to control particulate emissions. <br />The Saugus, Massachusetts, installation has met both the State of Massachu- <br />setts and Federal air standards. It remains a question, however, whether <br />an incinerator, equipped with even the most advanced air pollution control <br />equipment, can operate in compliance with the requirements of the California <br />Air Resources Board and local districts. <br />Refuse -Derived Fuel (RDF) Production <br />Refuse -derived fuel production involves a series of size reduction and <br />separation processes for converting refuse into a form suitable for use as <br />a substitute for a fossil fuel. Normally, RDF is used as a partial replace- <br />ment for coal in existing boiler installations. As a fuel product, RDF has <br />approximately one-half of the heat content of coal. <br />The technology of RDF production was first demonstrated in St. Louis <br />during the 1970's. Since that time, a number of RDF plants have been con- <br />structed throughout the United States. Many different processing schemes <br />have been used in the production of RDF. Generally, an RDF plant contains <br />a shredding line, magnetic separators and an air classifier for removal of <br />noncombustible materials. Additional equipment which may be integrated in <br />the plant design include trommels and screens for additional contaminant <br />removal, glass recovery systems, nonferrous separators and dryers. Some <br />plants have.been constructed with redundant processing lines to increase <br />the system reliability. <br />The cost of disposal at RDF plants varies widely as a function of the <br />complexity of the plant design and corresponding capital cost, revenues from <br />the sale of RDF, operation and maintenance costs, operating tonnage levels, <br />etc. Typical disposal fees at operating facilities are in the range of $8 <br />to $16 per ton. <br />To date, RDF has been marketed primarily to electric utilities for use <br />as a supplemental fuel in coal-fired boilers. All existing power plants in <br />Los Angeles are designed to burn either oil or natural gas and do not have <br />the ash handling facilities or particulate removal equipment which are <br />already part of a coal -burning installation. Therefore, the costs of convert- <br />ing an oil fuel boiler to burn RDF are considerably higher. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.