My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1981
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
1831
>
PR0440058
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 2:16:11 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:00:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1981
RECORD_ID
PR0440058
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004518
FACILITY_NAME
NORTH COUNTY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
17720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06512004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17720 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
CField
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440058_17720 E HARNEY_1981.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The feasibility of converting a boiler to burn RDF is sensitive to <br />site specific factors such as:' the location of the unit with respect to <br />the waste sypply; the remaining life of the boiler; extent of modifications <br />required; and availability of space for ash handling, waste storage and air <br />emissions equipment. <br />Pyrolysis <br />Refuse pyrolysis is a thermo-chemical process for the conversion of <br />waste into a usable fuel product: The primary by-products of the process <br />are combustible gases or liquids, solid residues and a wastewater effluent. <br />The composition of the waste input and the process conditions activate the <br />various ratios of gaseous, liquid and solid products produced. The waste- <br />water effluent normally contains a high percentage of soluble organic mate- <br />rial and requires on-site treatment or disposal in a sewer. Solid residues <br />vary in composition as a function of the process design producing granular <br />residues composed of inorganic constituents to carbonaceous material similar <br />to charcoal. <br />Application of pyrolytic technologies to refuse is a relatively recent <br />development. Two of the largest refuse pyrolysis projects constructed to <br />date are EPA supported pyrolysis demonstration plants in Baltimore, Maryland <br />and San Diego County, California. The Baltimore facility was designed to <br />process 1,000 tons of refuse daily and recover steam, char, glassy aggregate <br />and magnetic metals. Operation of the plant was initiated in'November 1974. <br />Under the terms of the agreement with the City of Baltimore, the manufacturer <br />was required to provide specific guarantees regarding the system performance. <br />When the plant failed to meet particulate emissions and reliability guarantees, <br />the manufacturer was penalized $4 million. After extensive modifications and <br />attempts to correct the problem, the-manufacturer'declared the demonstration a <br />failure and withdrew from the project in early 1977. The City of Baltimore <br />assumed control of the plant and has performed numerous modifications, includ- <br />ing installation of an electrostatic precipitator, gas purifier and gas <br />discharge stack. The plant has been operated intermittently at a rate of <br />600 tons per day. While the process appears technically feasible, the EPA <br />has concluded that it is unlikely to compete economically with alternate <br />disposal methods. <br />The San Diego project is a 200 -ton per day waste pyrolysis system <br />designed to convert refuse into a fuel oil. Constructed at a cost of approx- <br />imately $14.5 million, the demonstration plant began operation in August 1977. <br />During the subsequent test program, the longest period the system could be <br />operated on a continuous basis was 37 hours. The oil, which a utility company <br />had agreed to purchase, was of poor quality and sufficient quantities were not <br />produced to allow comprehensive tests. Operation of the plant was suspended <br />in July 1973, because additional substantial expenditures were required to <br />modify the system. The future plans by the process manufacture are unknown <br />and the system is not being marketed on a commercial basis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.