Laserfiche WebLink
#1. J <br />#1. <br />S. DeMartini., 115 N. Sutter <br />r*3 4 WAII .. <br />n <br />NUMNORMI._ . r. <br />Alleged that staff-.rrt is incorrect in calling the area <br />mainly dry-farmed <br />r - <br />_. and pasture. The 400 acre adjacent tothe- <br />south_s subsoiled and planted in trees <br />walnuts.The adjacent 160 acre parcel is interplanted cherries and <br />peaches, the 50 acres to the south is in apples and <br />- 200 acres south is in vineyard.of - .I0 acres, <br />it is under permanent sprinkler irrigation, that the record <br />shows this subject ar- . to i • prime agricultural <br />referral r r - i <br />was � .. Swanson of ais <br />CA, who was a San Joaquin County Farm Advisor from 1939 to <br />1948. <br />Staff - What Mr. DeMartini says is applicable only to his own <br />". but :. applied tr Hanuaond property.: r <br />land.prime agricultural <br />U. C. Berkeley Extension <br />rated land as marginal, land, and tho cost to brinU the soil <br />up to primary agricultural land would not be economically <br />Alleged there are 200 acres of zinfandels on Kettleman Lane; <br />GrAffigna has 240 acres on Fraser; the front is in grapes and <br />the rear in alfalfa --both of.these properties were well sub - <br />soiled with a D-9 caterpillar. After treatment, these soils <br />are equal to those south of here. <br />Staff - Both of these sites are west of Clements Road. The <br />HP—Ping is not a permanent solution where there is clay in <br />the soil as there is here. Clay has the capability of <br />recementing and therefore bringing back the original <br />conditions. <br />#1. James S. DeMartini . <br />Alleged that the County is proposing to pay $300,000 to acquirz <br />this site --this is $1250 • . acre; <br />Staffthe Sanitary Landfill should be on marginal land --the $1250 <br />per acre is not the price for marginal land. <br />• appraised value of Iii for <br />suEject property. <br />