Laserfiche WebLink
James• • <br />Allegedwould- $950,000 to acquireproperty; <br />the Department •Works• rrr for payment <br />of a site would be out of the question. <br />Staff - The County has an appraised value for the subject <br />property of $144 ,000. <br />#2. James Hammond (cont). <br />Alleged that the pits should be completly sealed so there would <br />be no leachate escaping. The Kleinfelder Report noted there <br />was gravel and road material on the property which could be <br />removed, and the pit should not be completely sealed, that <br />this is a complete change from the original position. If <br />the groundwater is contaminated from leachate, the situation <br />will be • <br />Staff - The underground water will not be contaminated with <br />I—eachates in that the site will • _ limited to the disposal <br />of dry solid wastes and will be in essence a -dry operation, <br />and it will therefore not be a requirement that the bottom <br />be sealed. <br />Davis,It has not been determined if the quality of the gravel <br />material would permit it to be used as concrete aggregatt; <br />or road base. However, should testing prove this to be <br />economically feasible, this may be considered. <br />03. Warren .1 Knox Drive, <br />Alleged that a percolation test had not been performed at th <br />site and that if the subsoil has a high percolation rate, th <br />site is unsuitable for a landfill; that although the water <br />table has declined, the conduits which conveyed water are <br />still there. These strata could carry leachate from the <br />landfill and cause underground water pollution; that percola <br />tion tests would show whether leachates would reach the unde <br />ground <br />Staff - The volumn of water would be so small, if it was produced <br />EN—at it would be penetrated into soil structure before it would <br />even reach the water table. <br />