Laserfiche WebLink
Page 10 <br />#3. Warren Davis (cont). <br />Alleged that there is a possibility of shallow water bisecting <br />the Hammond property, that the Kleinfelder Report was inadequate -- <br />the report makes no mention of springs near subject propertyf <br />that if a trench were to bisect the property on the east <br />boundary it would show as shallow strata. He asked why <br />trench was not cut as required, that the state requires <br />trenching --this would determine the location of shallow <br />water. That he researched springs in this area; the spring <br />flow is from northeast to southwest, that there is a water <br />strata on the subject property,the Robidart property has a <br />spring; there is a very old fig tree fed through the spring. <br />A letter from Mr. Ley stated the spring had been there about <br />40 years. Those springs could be connected by an underground <br />stream crossing the landfill site. <br />Staff - It was the opinion of the State staff geologist that <br />spr ngs in the area are the result of localized perched water <br />layers and do not represent the underground water conditions <br />of the area. <br />The attached letter dated June 3,.1976, from the California <br />Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region <br />states that the test borings in the Kleinfelder Report satisfy <br />the earlier request for a trench at the proposed landfill site <br />#4. Olive Davis, 5261 Knox Drive, Linden (property at corner of <br />Harney Lane & Clements Road <br />Alleged that the Bite property has a high rainfall, severe <br />rainstorms occur causing local flooding. The Swale draining <br />the Hammond property has been 150' wide with flowing water. <br />She said one time 3" of rainfall fell in a 2 -hour period, <br />that there is frequent, heavy runoff and overflow into adjacent <br />lands, and should recognize real, almost insurmountable drainage <br />problems. <br />Staff - As a high area relative to the adjacent terrain, the <br />she will not experience flooding, and will not be inundated <br />by the heavy runoff from storms. The staff drainage study <br />has considered the runoff from a storm having a predicted <br />frequency of once in 100 years. The design has determined <br />10 drainage areas as they exist today on the subject property. <br />These areas have been retained in the design to continue to <br />discharge the runoff proportionately to the same existing <br />watercourses and will thereby not alter, decrease or increase <br />the existing drainage problems of the adjacent properties. <br />Moisture penetration will be monitored through the installatic <br />of electronic tensiometer equipment at the landfill. „ <br />