Laserfiche WebLink
9. Cost Estimates for Implementation: <br /> Costs for source separation are born by the <br /> businesses that prepare plans and provide space for <br /> recyclable material bins, and by the refuse collectors <br /> that provide the storage bins and perform collection <br /> services. The refuse collector costs are passed on to <br /> the customer. Therefore, very little cost for source <br /> separation would be incurred by the jurisdiction, beyond <br /> the cost of enacting and enforcing necessary <br /> regulations. <br /> 10. Availability of End-Users: <br /> There are end-usermarkets locally and <br /> internationally for the materials targeted by these <br /> strategies. However, the markets for wood primarily use <br /> the wood for fuel and therefore cannot be counted toward <br /> the 25% diversion requirements. <br /> C. Disposal Site Strategies,Including Salvaging and Materials Recovery: <br /> PROGRAM DISCUSSION: <br /> Recycling from the County's waste streams couldbe <br /> accomplished through separation at central or regional waste <br /> disposal sites. Manual or mechanical separation methods <br /> could be used to divert readily accessible materials from <br /> the residential, commercial, industrial and self-haul waste <br /> streams. <br /> During 1990 and 1991, the County diverted wood, scrap <br /> metals, white goods, and tires from the disposal stream at <br /> the Harney Lane Landfill. That program provided information <br /> on the amount of material that could be separated at disposal <br /> Chapter 4 - Recycling 32 <br />