Laserfiche WebLink
Ee <br />These special waste types, especially inert wastes, <br />make up a large portion of the total waste generation <br />stream. They also are subject to wide variations from <br />year to year. Therefore, it is difficult to make <br />accurate predictions of waste quantities that will be <br />diverted in future years. <br />When waste diversion activities for special wastes <br />for the 1990 year are added to other waste diversion <br />activities, and projected to the years 1995 and 2000, the <br />results in Table 10-2 are obtained. <br />Table 10-2 indicates that the County is currently <br />diverting 40% of its waste stream. This creates a <br />quandary in that the County currently meets waste <br />diversion requirements through the year 1999. However, <br />quantities for the special waste types are very erratic. <br />Thus, it is difficult for the County to plan other waste <br />diversion activities in order to meet the 25% and 50% <br />diversion rates of the Act. <br />Due to the above, the County will proceed to <br />implement the waste diversion strategies presented in <br />this SRRE, designed to achieve the 25% and 50% goals, <br />without counting the diversions, of the special wastes <br />discussed above. However, if implementation of these <br />strategies result in a shortfall of waste quantities <br />diverted, then the County will add special waste <br />diversion activities to other waste diversion activities <br />in order to meet its 25% and 50% diversion goals. <br />NIVOITIPM 91111011111,11 -1 � 'P.- I I I 1.110� . it M# <br />1. Source Reduction: <br />Source Reduction has the greatest priority <br />Chapter 10 - Integration <br />12 1 <br />11 <br />