Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br />r <br />C <br />0 <br />0 <br />G <br />r <br />• Animals listed as sensitive by the local U.S. Forest Service region (Forest Service Manual 2670) <br />or U.S. Bureau of Land Management resource area. <br />Special -Status Plant Species <br />Methods <br />Pre -Field Investigation. Before conducting the field visit, a Jones & Stokes Associates botanist <br />compiled a list of special -status plants with potential to occur at the project site (Table 4.2.1). <br />Species were targeted on this list if they were known or suspected to be present in the region and <br />if they were known to occur in the types of plant communities that potentially occur at the project <br />site. <br />Information used to compile the list was derived from NDDB (1993) and Smith and Berg (1988). <br />Habitat requirements of special -status plants were determined based on information in Hickman <br />(1993), Smith and Berg (1988), and Munz and Keck (1973). Two species, caper -fruited <br />tropidocarpum and showy Indian clover, could potentially occur in the plan area based on their <br />regional distribution and habitat association. Both species prefer undisturbed sites with mesic <br />(moist), highly alkaline soils. <br />Field Survey. A field survey for special -status plants was conducted by a Jones & Stokes <br />Associates botanist on August 20, 1993. The survey was conducted on meandering transects <br />throughout the project area to locate and identify all vascular plant species in the area. Each <br />species encountered was identified to the extent necessary to determine its legal status or <br />qualification as a special -status species. The floristic survey methods used ensured that no <br />special -status plants were overlooked because they were not expected to occur in the region. <br />Results <br />No special -status plants were observed during the field survey, One occurrence of caper -fruited <br />tropidocarpum was documented approximately 5 miles north of the project site but has not been <br />seen since 1937 and is believed to be extirpated due to urban development (Natural Diversity <br />Data Base 1993). <br />Although the field survey was not conducted during the appropriate survey periods for the two <br />target special -status species, results of the survey indicate that suitable habitat does not exist for <br />either of these species on the project site because of the highly disturbed nature of the <br />grasslands and lack of alkali and mesic sites. <br />Special -Status Wildlife Species <br />Methods <br />Pre -Field Investigation. Before visiting the site, Jones & Stokes Associates reviewed the NDDB <br />(1993) records for the area and contacted agencies to determine if any special -status wildlife <br />species were known to occur at the project site. Potentially suitable habitat for 10 special -status <br />wildlife species was identified within the project site. A brief description of their legal status, <br />distribution, and habitat association is provided in Table 4.2.2. <br />USFWS and DFG identified 10 additional special -status wildlife species that could have potential <br />to occur at the proposed project site (White and Broddrick pers. comms.): the valley elderberry <br />longhorn beetle, Aleutian Canada goose, giant garter snake, California tiger salamander, western <br />spadefoot toad, foothill yellow -legged frog, western pond turtle, riparian brush rabbit, San Joaquin <br />Valley woodrat, and Pacific western big -eared bat. Jones & Stokes Associates concluded that <br />no suitable habitat exists at the project site for any of these species. <br />IER -93-1 -36- (9-27-93) <br />