Laserfiche WebLink
IF, <br />There are two agricultural wells on MacArthur Drive, 0.5 mi N of the Site, and 100 ft NE of the site. Both <br />are downgradient of the site. There are two mobile home residences approximately 600 feet NE of the <br />site. There is a residential subdivision 1.5 mi N on MacArthur. There is one residence to the south. The <br />project applicant is proposing to develop a well (or wells) on the site for the provision of water for human <br />consumption, fire protection, and wash -down use in the transfer and recycling facility. <br />Condor Earth Technologies, Inc. has completed a Water Well Survey for a two-mile radius of the site. This <br />survey is included in the appendix to this document. <br />The Environmental Site Assessment of Assessor Parcel number 253-130-19 (EBA, 1993), completed by <br />EBA Wastechnologies in February, 1993 cites a number of potential sources of ground water <br />contamination in the vicinity of the site. There are two sites, RMC Lonestar Industries located at 30350 <br />S. Tracy Boulevard and Teichert Aggregates' Tracy Rock Plant located at 29099 S. MacArthur Drive, <br />undergoing investigation for toxic or hazardous substances releases. Both sites lie within a one mile <br />radius of the project site. Both sites apparently have leaking underground storage tank problems. <br />However, local ground water flows towards the north, away from the project site. <br />The SF Royster Tire Disposal, a 52 -acre tire landfill located at 29425 MacArthur Drive, although not <br />mentioned in the site assessment report, is considered to be a potential source of migrating <br />contamination. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES I <br />This section identifies and discusses the potentially significant environmental impacts to water resources <br />which result from the development and operation of the Tracy Materials Recovery and Transfer Facility. <br />The analysis has been formulated on the basis of available information, using reasonable projections of <br />the worst case consequences. For the purposes of this section, an environmental impact is defined as <br />a change in the status of the existing physical conditions that would be affected by the proposed action <br />or alternative. The effects can be direct (primary), which are caused by the project and occur at the same <br />time and place, or indirect (secondary), which are caused by the project and are later in time or farther <br />removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. <br />Specific, detailed mitigation measures are proposed and described for all potentially significant <br />environmental impacts. Where there is no feasible mitigation identifiable, or where proposed mitigation <br />measures do not reduce the impact to a level of less -than -significant, the impact is considered to be a <br />significant, unavoidable, adverse impact. <br />Significance Criteria <br />The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Supplementary Document G, states that "A project will <br />normally have a significant effect on the environment if it will: conflict with adopted environmental plans <br />and goals of the community where it is located; substantially degrade water quality; contaminate a public <br />water supply; substantially degrade or deplete ground water resources; interfere substantially with ground <br />water recharge; or cause substantial flooding, erosion, or siltation. <br />Impacts would be considered significant if they could result in one or more of the following conditions: <br />Degrade surface water quality, thereby affecting downstream use(s). I <br />Degrade ground water quality such that other existing and proposed uses of the resource in the <br />project area would be affected; or exceeclance of threshold criteria as set forth in water quality <br />protection standards. <br />Withdraw significant water quantities from an aquifer which is already in overdraft. <br />ER -93-1 - 67 - (9-27-93) 1 <br />