ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

TABLE 3.1 SUMMARY TABLE OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ........................... ................. ............................ ........... .. .. .. ........ ..... ... ... ....... ....... — . . ..... ... . . ............... ........ ...... .......... ....... .......IMPACT. .................. .................. .................. ........... ....... . ......... .... .... . . WILL 1 ......... ........................... ............... ............................ X ALL IGNIFICANT: IMPACTS:* S ...... ::::::;:j:j:�SUGGESTED .... IGNIFICANT7."""' Land Use Potential bird hazard from on-site drainage pond to aviation In The use of netting, a noise system, or other means to ward off Yes the area. birds shall be used as required by the Airport Land Use Commission If a bird hazard Is Identified. Vegetation and Wildlife Resources Potential direct mortality of San Joaquin kit fox during Conduct preconstruction surveys within 60 days before the Yes construction and ground disturbing activities. start of construction, and It any kit foxes are found, undertake precautions specified In Chapter 4.2, Condition 4.2-4. Cumulative loss of Swainson's hawk foraging habitat. Follow mended by !he California elude the purchas" Yes MIUgat; 1 A ratio (1.9 , I acre . "Mont f0F each I acre loss of ha In carrying out the operations of the project, the applicant shall take no actions which violate the provisions of the California Endangered Species Act or any other laws or regulations pertaining to the protection of the Swainson's hawk. Compliance with said laws shall be the sole responsibility o the applicant, and the applicant shall agree to indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless from and against any claim or action by affected State agencies as to the project's compliance with said laws. Potential disturbance to breeding or wintering burrowing owls. Conduct preconstruction surveys for burrowing owl, and avoid Yes adverse impacts on burrowing owls, if present, as specified in Chapter 4.2, Condition 4.2-6. Geology and Geotechnical The proposed project would expose workers and project facilities Seismic design shall be in accordance with the Uniform Yes to seismic hazards. Building Code (Seismic Zone 4), as specified in the project's geotechnical report contained in Appendix F. Excavated and fill slopes at the proposed project site could Proper construction practices, according to the geotechnical Yes potentially fail, causing injury, damage to facilities, or burying engineer's recommendations contained in Appendix F, shall be solid waste material. followed for all new cuts and fills. In areas where slopes are steeper than 2:1, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: regrade slopes to 2:1 or flatter, or set back all Improvements at least 30 feel from the top and bottom of the slopes, or erect landslide debris barriers. -22- (9-27-93)