Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 1 <br /> Natalia Subbotnikova [EH] <br /> From: Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:18 AM <br /> To: Natalia Subbotnikova [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill Inspection <br /> FYI <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Yekta, Gino [mailto:GYekta@CIWMB.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 7:52 PM <br /> To: Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill Inspection <br /> Sure, that is what I thought and had conveyed in my message of November 17 below. So, in a way, the LEA <br /> cited the County for cover over one year after the waste had been discovered. <br /> Gino, it looks like the county was cited for a violation of final cover on September 6, 2006. Thanks Robert <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Yekta, Gino [mailto:GYekta@CIWMB.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 12:22 PM <br /> To: Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Cc: Wochnick, Michael <br /> Subject: Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill Inspection <br /> When I had talked to you last week, I thought you had told me that the issue at Corral Hollow had <br /> been noted on your inspection report as violation or AC (not quite remember what you had told me), <br /> however, I just checked our SWIS data base and noted that June 2006 inspection ( one year after <br /> the waste was discovered) might be the first inspection report where this discovered waste outside <br /> of the closed landfill is noted as an Area of Concern. Was it noted on previous inspections from the <br /> time the waste was discovered back in 2005? It might have but I just do not have any records of <br /> it. <br /> It is of course up to you what to call this issue on your inspection report, but it appears that portion of <br /> the landfill that was not adequately closed and which has been discovered for almost one year and <br /> a half might be more in line with a violation. Just thought to let you know. <br /> 1/10/2007 <br />