Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />THOMAS M. GAU <br />CHIEF DEPUTY DIRECTOR <br />MANUEL SOLORIO <br />DEPUTY DIRECTOR <br />STEVEN WINKLER <br />DEPUTY DIRECTOR <br />ROGERJANES <br />BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR <br />THOMAS R. FLINN <br />DIRECTOR <br />January 23, 2007 <br />Mr. Todd Del Frate <br />California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />Central Valley Region <br />11020 Sun Center Drive, #200 <br />Rancho Cordova, California 95670-6114 <br />P. O. BOX 1810 -1810 E. HAZELTON AVENUE <br />STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA 95201 <br />(209) 488-3000 FAX (209) 488-2999 <br />www.sjgovorg/pubworks <br />SUBJECT: INCREASE OF CORRECTIVE ACTION, CORRAL HOLLOW SANITARY LANDFILL <br />Dear Mr. Del Frate: <br />This letter is in response to your letter of December 7, 2006, regarding the continued detections at our <br />impacted shallow aquifer monitoring well MW -5 of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), apparently from <br />landfill gas. It seems clear that increased corrective action is needed, and we discussed over the phone the <br />approach that we contemplate: increasing LFG collection along the edge of the landfill near the impacted <br />well, coordinated with the planned extension of the closure cap in that area. As you noted, Section 20430 <br />0) of Title 27 CCR is the correct section for a site where corrective action is not as effective as hoped. I <br />think it important that this site is in corrective action, rather than in detection monitoring where <br />discovering a new release requires assessing the "extent of release". Rather than that time-consuming <br />activity, which may bear little fruit, I propose that we go directly to additional corrective action. <br />VOCs in the groundwater have gradually decreased after the start of operation of the LFG system. Ten <br />VOCs were seen with a maximum concentration of 9.2 ppb were reported in the quarterly groundwater <br />monitoring at MW -5 immediately before the operation of the LFG system (October 2001). In contrast, <br />only five VOCs were reported in the most recent quarterly monitoring (October 2006) with a maximum <br />concentration of 7.4 ppb. The dramatic decrease in combustible gas seen in the perimeter migration <br />monitoring wells (see Results of Corrective Action, Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill Landfill Gas <br />Collection System, September 27, 2002). Let me know if you need a copy of this report. <br />Unfortunately, certain VOCs remain consistently and repeatedly detected, so it is appropriate to enhance <br />the corrective action effort to increase the effectiveness of corrective action. <br />I believe the difficulty in collecting LFG from the aquifer near MW -5 area is due to the thinness of refuse <br />at the landfill's edge and distance from the landfill's edge to the LFG wells. It seems likely that some <br />LFG is not being collected from that outlying area, in spite of the significant collection effort applied, and <br />that this gas continues to impact groundwater of the shallow aquifer. <br />The LFG system is now being operated at near -maximum withdrawal, with many wells showing methane <br />content below 10%, so it would be unwise for us to further increase collection from this system. The <br />solution is to increase the level of LFG collection in that area by other means. <br />