My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2007 (1/07 - 6/07)
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
31130
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440003
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2007 (1/07 - 6/07)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2021 2:34:59 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:06:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2007 (1/07 - 6/07)
RECORD_ID
PR0440003
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0003698
FACILITY_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
31130
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
31130 CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4434_PR0440003_31130 CORRAL HOLLOW_2007 (1/07 - 6/07).tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 7 <br /> O [ 40 <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Yekta, Gino [mailto:GYekta@CIWMB.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 8:46 AM <br /> To: Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Cc: Wochnick, Michael <br /> Subject: RE: Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill Phase 2 Investigation (Extent of Closure Cap) <br /> I think the method they have used is acceptable (as is the norm for delineation process), however, <br /> they need to be more detailed and use more points to determine the lateral (and maybe vertical) <br /> extent of waste. <br /> From: Robert McClellon [EH] [mailto:RMcClellon@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Tue 11/14/2006 8:26 AM <br /> To: Yekta, Gino <br /> Subject: RE: Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill Phase 2 Investigation (Extent of Closure Cap) <br /> Gino, so noted. I have a question for you regarding the further delineation of the waste. When you <br /> and I spoke yesterday, you stated that they just went and potholed with a backhoe. Is that an <br /> acceptable method for delineation? If so would a plan to do addition site work using this same <br /> method be acceptable to you or would you like to see something with a drill rig? Or maybe a sting <br /> resistivity survey? Do not mean to take up all your time on this issue, but if I could get a clear idea <br /> from you what might be acceptable I will work with Solid Waste Division (SWD) to try and get that to <br /> you. Sorry for the frustration. Robert <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Yekta, Gino [mailto:GYekta@CIWMB.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 7:24 AM <br /> To: Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Cc: TDelFrate@waterboards.ca.gov <br /> Subject: RE: Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill Phase 2 Investigation (Extent of Closure <br /> Cap) <br /> I forgot to mention to you that suggest that all plans (delineation as well as <br /> remediation) should be forwarded to Todd so that he could also review how the extent <br /> of this waste has been delineated as well as how the operator is proposing to cover <br /> the waste. As I have stated before, RWQCB approval to continue on this project is an <br /> important step.....Gino <br /> From: Robert McClellon [EH] [mai Ito:RMcClel lon@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Mon 11/13/2006 11:50 AM <br /> To: Yekta, Gino <br /> Subject: RE: Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill Phase 2 Investigation (Extent of Closure <br /> Cap) <br /> Gino, here is what I have found out. I spoke with Todd Del Frate is going to review the <br /> plan. He will provide comments regarding the plan during the week of November 20, <br /> 2006. Mr.. Del Frate indicated that he would run it by his supervisor. Mike <br /> Carrol copied Mike Wochnic on the April 4, 2006 work plan. Again I apologize <br /> for coping Keith Kennedy and not you on the response letter(it was an oversight). I <br /> spoke with Michael Carrol regarding the possibility of amending the Closure-Post <br /> Closure Plan. I asked him for any correspondence that he may have received from <br /> Mr.. Del Frate. I think that we should wait and see Todd Del Frate's comments prior to <br /> meeting/conference call. I do think that it would be good for everyone to sit down at a <br /> table and get this all straightened out for the sake of timeliness. Robert <br /> 1/10/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.