Laserfiche WebLink
MW-9A,which was suspected to be related to the recent placement of a final cover <br /> system on the landfill and landfill gas (LFG) generation. In a meeting with the RWQCB <br /> on March 9, 2007, the RWQCB agreed to quarterly monitoring of existing groundwater <br /> monitoring wells and soil-pore gas probes through May 2008 to evaluate the significance <br /> of LFG at the site. Although low-level VOCs continue to be intermittently detected in <br /> compliance wells, it is not uncommon to find slight increases (microgram per liter) in the <br /> concentrations of VOCs shortly after final cover construction is complete that over time <br /> stabilize or decline as the final cover matures and a geochemical equilibrium is reached. <br /> During the 2008 monitoring year no NOVs were issued by the LEA or CIWMB and the <br /> site is currently in compliance. <br /> 7.0 SUMMARY <br /> Groundwater quality conditions beneath the French Camp Landfill during the monitoring <br /> period are generally similar to those observed in previous monitoring periods. CLs were <br /> exceeded for one or more constituents in the samples collected from wells MW-6A, <br /> MW-9A, MW-913 and MW-10A, and with the exception of the chloride concentration <br /> measured in the sample collected from well MW-10A, none of the constituents that <br /> exceeded a CL exhibited a statistically significant increasing trend during the monitoring <br /> period. Previous statistical exceedances for chloride and TDS have been identified in <br /> samples from well MW-1 OA and a NRD for groundwater monitoring well MW-I OA <br /> (Herst, 2005) concluded that the French Camp Landfill has been impacted by saltwater <br /> intrusion and the elevated chloride and TDS concentrations measured in well MW-I OA <br /> are believed to be the result of this condition and not the result of landfill-related impacts. <br /> Organic constituent results indicate chloroform and TCFM were measured above the <br /> PQL in the samples collected from wells MW-6A and MW-9A, respectively. Similar <br /> concentrations of TCFM have been measured in samples collected from well MW-9A, <br /> and in a letter dated January 16, 2007, the RWQCB was notified of the non-statistical <br /> indication of a release at well MW-9A, which has been attributed to the recent placement <br /> of a final cover system on the landfill and associated landfill gas migration. The results <br /> of the retest samples collected from background well MW-6A indicate that no VOCs <br /> were detected and the concentration of chloroform in the primary sample was a false <br /> positive. <br /> The results of water quality analyses completed for surface-water monitoring stations are <br /> generally consistent with previous results. During the current monitoring period, no CL <br /> were exceeded, and with the exception of turbidity in all three surface-water samples, no <br /> statistically significant increasing trends were noted. Since turbidity exhibits a <br /> statistically significant increasing trend at background surface water stations SW-1 and <br /> SW-2, the increasing trend in turbidity at SW-3 is unlikely to be indicative of an impact <br /> from the facility. <br /> D:\200"0121FC2SA08.doc <br /> — <br /> 8 Geologic Associates <br />