|
Firmpropipse f
<br /> r < T
<br /> dura � w
<br /> running �
<br /> 2—Lodi (Ca.) - Myer R.,Jan.ill,1973
<br /> ponHarne Lane DumpIan...
<br /> y
<br /> STOCKTON (SJNS)—A San disposal site would be avoided. (Continued from Page One) Trewhitt said his firm would
<br /> Francisco solid waste The firm listed six other outlay for the purchase of new
<br /> management firm Tuesday benefits the county and the P purchase modern, updated
<br /> land. equipment to "do a better job
<br /> submitted a proposal to the City of Lodi would derive from "At theresent rate of
<br /> San Joaquin County Board of the turnover. P of compacting and covering
<br /> Supervisors for the operation Vice President Wayne D filling, the county estimates the wasteste
<br /> the purchase of 320 acres will He asserted that the cost to
<br /> of the Harney Lane Sanitary Trewhitt's eight-pagebe necessary within the next Lodi and the count for
<br /> Landfill. document and cover letter was Y
<br /> Easley&Brassy Corp. said promptly referred to ,Countyr two„years.
<br /> operating Harney Lane land-
<br /> its proposed operation of the Public Works Director�Charlea' There is certainly no fill has been steadily rising
<br /> dumping site would extend its Wong and Lodi officials. Justification for purchase of a over the past years.
<br /> life for 10 years and the work, Trewhitt said the firm is new site when it is possible to He noted the 1971-72 budget
<br /> time and expense and energy offering the county "an op- extend the existing Harney was 4 and the latest
<br /> involved in seeking a new portunity to plan its future Lane site until 1983," he estimaatete b by the county shows
<br /> contended. an operating cost of $133,632
<br /> waste disposal management in Trewhitt further noted the "which does not allow or
<br /> a way that will not cost its
<br /> City
<br /> existing trenching operation is vacations, sick leave, etc. nor
<br /> p�Ccitizens a dime in taxes and resulting in unlevel land with does it allow for amortization
<br /> ei J will save the county hundreds low areas that pond water. of any capital investment in
<br /> of thousands of dollars during "The finished fill will have equipment or improvements
<br /> the next few years. very little value and will which will substantially add to
<br /> landfi
<br /> ll "1—The first offer is based require continuous main- the estimated total cost to the
<br /> on a 10-year lease agreement tenance by the county after the county."
<br /> with the owners of the filling operations ceases. He said that by continuing to
<br /> property (the City of Lodi or "Under our plan, the site use Harney Lane for 10 years,
<br /> deadline San Joaquin County) whereby will be level and well drained, the city and the county citizens
<br /> Easley & Brassy Corporation suitable for farming, grazing are assured of a stabilized
<br /> By JOYCE GOMBOS agrees to pay the owner$1 per or park land." garbage disposal site.
<br /> News-Sentinel staff writer year to conduct a sanitary The corporation leader said "However,if the site is filled
<br /> Tentative approval of the landfill. the proposal would solve the in twoears, and a truck
<br /> San Joaquin proposal that `2—The second offer is to short and intermediate range transfer system or a barging-
<br /> Lodi should bow out of the purchase the 127 acres of planning for the city, and com otin system is ado
<br /> operations of the Harney Lane Harney Lane disposal site (97 P g Y adopted
<br /> would allow the supervisors as the disposal method, the
<br /> Sanitary Landfill was voted on acres being owned by the City and public works director time city would find the disposal
<br /> last night by Lodi City of Lodi and 30 acres by San j to spend on other areas of costs increased from three to
<br /> Councilmen with certain Joaquin County) for a total county government
<br /> conditions including that of consideration of $15,000. -, six times over the present
<br /> setting the date for the tran- He said the firm would rate.
<br /> saction for June 30, 1974. furnish all engineering, Trewhitt said immediate
<br /> action is essential to the firm's
<br /> Earlier in the evening, supervision, tools, equipment,
<br /> personnel and,materials for offer.
<br /> following a public hearing,the
<br /> council in a unanimous vote the operation. "Because of the present
<br /> trenching operation, more
<br /> The firm would further
<br /> approved a recommendation
<br /> of the City Planning Com- comply with regulations ` and the land is being wasted every day
<br /> mission for prezoning of the governing, burning, dust program gram becomes
<br /> San Joaquin County area control,blowing waste control, progressively less favorable.
<br /> placement and compaction of "Therefore, these offers
<br /> generally south of Kettleman P P
<br /> Lane, west of Highway 99-50, refuse, placement in ground- become null and void after
<br /> north of Century Boulevard water,daily cover,final cover, Feb. 28.
<br /> and east of the Southern demolition and construction
<br /> Pacific Railroad Company materials, salvage operations
<br /> right-of-way. and other generally applicable
<br /> The zoning proposals are to'; statutes.
<br /> become effective when the Trewhitt said the firm would
<br /> property is annexed into the l.. want to be permitted to set a
<br /> city. rate structure and would
<br /> Teo persons who expressed agree to purchase the county's
<br /> opposition to the proposal equipment at the site subject
<br /> were Ed Reimehe, who to two independent appraisals.
<br /> operates a business at 306 E. He said the county could
<br /> Kettleman Lane andRay either accept the firm's price
<br /> Wintersteen of 248 E. Ket- offer for the
<br /> or
<br /> tleman Lane, also a rp;P"+ •74mino4seld the
<br /> businessman in that area. uo31jewy-uod'Io4I
<br /> On the issue of the con- , 08mON s,lpo-1
<br /> troversial Harney Lane
<br /> Landfill, council'members, in
<br /> general, re-stated their
<br /> agreement of last Tuesday's (WJ04d s.'(0""""a K'")
<br /> informal session—mainly that *SAV 100*1*M got
<br /> the city should continue to
<br /> operate the facility until it is
<br /> turned over to the county.
<br />- The date of June 30,1974 was
<br /> set to give the project priority
<br /> Pl'gp county meanwhile is
<br />
|