My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1972-1992
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
14750
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440007
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1972-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2021 2:49:53 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:08:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1972-1992
RECORD_ID
PR0440007
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0000595
FACILITY_NAME
HARNEY LANE LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
14750
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06503006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
14750 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4434_PR0440007_14750 E HARNEY_1972-1992.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Loan cit council mrows. wit <br /> county's ump conclusions <br /> Lodi City Councilmen, at the organization needed and to The reason for setting a time <br /> their informal session manage the facility ef- limit for the transaction is to <br /> yesterday morning, agreed ficiently. give priority to the project and <br /> that Lodi should bow out of the Lodi's Councilmen, spurred spur the county on in its efforts <br /> Harney Lane Landfill by City Manager Henry to obtain anew site and get the <br /> operation, in accordance with Glaves and Public Works facility into operation. <br /> recommendations from a San Director Shelley Jones, feel Glaves told the group that <br /> Joaquin County study of the that a time limit should be set operation of a sanitary landfill <br /> problem — but with certain for the transfer. is more and more a county <br /> reservations. They agreed that the affair, because of increasing <br /> The county recommendation reasonable date for the state regulations, and also <br /> is that the City of Lodi should transition would be the end of because it is not possible for a <br /> continue the operation of the June in 1974,which marks the city to provide its own site for <br /> existing landfill site, pending beginning of a new fiscal year. such an operation. <br /> acquisition of a new site by the The matter is set for action In addition, he pointed out, <br /> county, thus allowing the at tonight's formal meeting of the county is in a better <br /> county sufficient time to gear the Council when the Landfill position to provide more <br /> up with the personnel and Study will be presented for <br /> equipment required to develop review. (Continued on Page 2,Col.5) <br /> Dump <br /> (Continued from Page One) <br /> adequate and efficient per- <br /> sonnel to manage the facility <br /> than the city could do. <br /> During the early period of <br /> yesterday's discussion, <br /> Councilman James Pinkerton <br /> declared that he favored a <br /> private enterprise operation, <br /> while Councilman Richard <br /> Hughes said that he is"not all <br /> that anxious to get out of the <br /> business while it is being run <br /> properly" and that under the <br /> present joint operation the city <br /> has a "reasonable control." <br /> However, Glaves said that <br /> increasing state regulations <br /> which must be met,along with <br /> the lack of manpower to <br /> supervise the facility have <br /> made such a transfer all but <br /> mandatory. <br /> Mayor Ezra Ehrhardt <br /> •eed, saying that new <br /> islation puts the respon- <br /> lities on the counties rather <br /> n the cities — that the <br /> vice is of a regional nature. <br /> We have reached the day in <br /> society when we cannot <br /> vide certain services by <br /> selves." <br /> ouncilmen indicated that <br /> re is no anticipated change <br /> the house-to-house pickup <br /> -vice by the franchised <br /> .venger. <br /> 'he subject of fees and the <br /> firing of revenues,discussed <br /> detail in the report, was <br /> nmented on by the coun- <br /> ren, but definite decisions <br /> re postponed pending <br /> •ther study of the issue. <br /> nerally,they agreed to "go <br /> ing" with the county <br /> !ommendations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.