Laserfiche WebLink
Monitoring Report Compliance Checklis 4 <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A RWQCB <br /> Reviewer Comment <br /> t. Is there a map showing the area <br /> and elevations in which filling has <br /> been completed during the past <br /> year and comparison to final <br /> closure contours? <br /> WDRs u. Is there a summary of the <br /> Standard monitoring results indicating any <br /> Provisions changes made or observed since <br /> (1993,1997,2000, the previous annual report? <br /> 2003) <br /> v. Is there an evaluation of the <br /> effectiveness 4af the leachate <br /> monitoring/control facilities? <br /> Standard w. Is there a discussion about the <br /> Provisions annual LCRS testing and a <br /> (April 2000, comparison to earlier testing? <br /> Sept. 2003)or <br /> check WDRs <br /> Compliance achieved? (check one) Yes No_X_ <br /> If No, check all issues that apply and provide comments: <br /> Comments (to be entered into CIWQS/Geotracker): <br /> Incomplete transmittal letter <br /> Incomplete report Continued VOC detections in well MW-2. Discharger <br /> Inadequate monitoring program has proposed additional corrective action. <br /> New release <br /> Inadequate response to evidence of a release <br /> WDRs violation other than listed above <br /> _X_ Other(explain in comments) <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> 2.m. Well MW-1 (upgradient) exhibits increasing EC and TDS concentrations. Discharger believes these <br /> increases are due to upgradient source and not landfill. Well MW-3 (downgradient) also has an increasing trend <br /> of Chloride and turbidity. Well MW-4 had decreasing trends in EC and TDS. <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> — <br /> Date: <br />