Laserfiche WebLink
l <br /> MW-2 <br /> No general water quality parameter concentration limits were exceeded this period. <br /> Two VOCs, PCE and Toluene, were detected at trace concentrations. <br /> CFC-12 and 1,2-Dichloropropane were not detected in MW-2 during this sampling period. These <br /> two compounds were historically detected at MW-2 until last detected in 2007. The lack of these <br /> compounds indicates that landfill gas extraction apparently has been successful in reducing or <br /> removing the VOC impact near this well. <br /> The trend analysis by Sanitas software indicates increasing trends for Turbidity, TDS, Sulfate, <br /> Calcium, Hardness as CaCO3, and Oxygen Reduction Potential and a decreasing trend for <br /> Chloride, and PCE during this period. <br /> The Electrical Conductivity concentration in this well (376.4 mg/L) is far below the secondary <br /> maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 900 uS/cm, which indicates good water quality. TDS has <br /> also not exceeded the secondary MCL standards. <br /> It is unlikely that the increasing trend in turbidity is a result of landfill activities. Siltation within the <br /> well is often the cause of an increase in turbidity that does not affect the water quality of the <br /> aquifer outside of the well. As such, turbidity is an indicator of well function and not an indicator <br /> of landfill impact to groundwater. <br /> MW-3A (Directly Down-Gradient) <br /> Concentrations of all the parameters analyzed were within established concentration limits where <br /> limits could be determined (Table 1). <br /> One VOC (CFC-12) was detected at a trace concentration. <br /> MW-4A <br /> Concentrations of all the parameters analyzed were within established concentration limits where <br /> limits could be determined (Table 1). <br /> Two VOCs (PCE and Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene) were detected. The concentration of trans-1,2- <br /> Dichloroethene decreased from 21 to 3.7 ppb since the last sampling event. Similarly, PCE <br /> decreased from, 0.72 ppb to trace in the same time. This may indicate that these compounds <br /> were inadvertently introduced during construction, and are now being purged from the well. <br /> MW-5 <br /> Concentrations of all the parameters analyzed were within established concentration limits where <br /> limits could be determined (Table 1). <br /> A trace concentration of PCE and CFC-12 below 1.0 ppb were detected. <br /> MW-5 was installed between the sewage treatment ponds of the migrant labor camp and Landfill <br /> 2 portion of the site. The purpose of this well is to determine if the treatment ponds were <br /> contributing constituents to groundwater. MW-5 is upgradient of Landfill 2 and represents <br /> background water quality conditions. <br /> Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill 5 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 1s'Semiannual 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Report County of San Joaquin—July 31,2014 <br />