Laserfiche WebLink
lanes is adequate into the future to the year 2010 if the new computer system can <br /> process at a rate of one transaction each 30 seconds during peak periods and <br /> assuming Non-Automated Disposal traffic increases proportionately with the County <br /> waste projections for the Station. Additionally, the County will assign a second <br /> cashier window, if needed during peaks, to speed up processing time. <br /> The assumed traffic projections are based on County Station waste estimates in the <br /> 1990 Waste Quantity Report for "high" or more conservative projections. Actual <br /> future Station traffic will depend upon a variety of factors including actual waste <br /> generation, recycling, and the types of future site users. For example, if future <br /> increases in waste are more proportioned towards automated disposal users, or actual <br /> quantities are less than the "high"estimates; then stacking may be less of a concern. <br /> Lovelace Road: <br /> In addition to the Station Project, the County plans to widen Lovelace Road <br /> according to a project to be performed by the County. Design will be performed so <br /> that transition grades will be coordinated with the Station grading plans. The site <br /> plans show an expected configuration for the upgrades to Lovelace Road, which will <br /> include a left turn lane for traffic heading east. <br /> C. Drainage System Capacities <br /> Drainage calculations for the storm drain system shown are in Appendix E. Drawing <br /> RSI-7 shows the design layout of the system. The criteria used for design was the <br /> County Standards 1991, as indicated. <br /> d. Soil Balance <br /> The expansion and renovation of the Station will include demolition of existing <br /> structures and improvements and construction of new structures, roadways and <br /> improvements. In addition toearthwork for construction, there is existing waste in <br /> the northeast comer of the existing Station which will be excavated and disposed of <br /> off-site prior to construction on these areas. The existing waste was buried by <br /> previous sites owners prior to the County's operation of the site. Limited excavation <br /> in the pond area by the County in the past appeared to indicated that the waste is <br /> remains of old refuse bum and inert waste disposal pits which were covered with soil <br /> (generally inert material, bottles and residual ash remain). <br /> In November 1992,Kleinfelder performed a geotechnical investigation of the site for <br /> the expansion project. Borings and soil testing was performed to evaluate <br /> geotechnical requirements for the project. The old burned waste area was also <br /> investigated with borings to give a preliminary estimate and the quantity of waste <br /> which would be removed as part of the construction project. <br /> Soil balance calculations for the project are in Appendix F and indicate that the <br /> estimated soil balance is approximately 1,500 to 3,500 cubic yards. These calculations <br /> 07549001.012 27 September 23,1993 <br />