Laserfiche WebLink
IV. IMPACT OVERVIEW <br /> project would have 60 vehicles, an increase of 13 vehicles over the existing fleet. This increase <br /> in vehicles that would be parked on site should not substantially increase glare(e.g,. from cab <br /> windows)emanating from the site. The aforementioned wall proposed along the western <br /> boundary, which would be painted in a neutral color with non reflective paint, would serve to <br /> reduce any negative visual effects of the container storage area on neighbors to the west. <br /> SOCIO-ECONOMIC, FISCAL, OR OTHER SECONDARY EFFECTS <br /> The project would not contribute to cumulative impacts related to employment, fiscal or related <br /> conditions in the vicinity of the project site or in the community. <br /> REFERENCES —IMPACT OVERVIEW <br /> City of Stockton, City of Stockton General Plan Revision and Infrastructure/Public Facilities <br /> Master Plans Environmental Impact Report,prepared by Michael Paoli and Associates; adopted <br /> by the City Council January 22, 1990a. <br /> City of Stockton, City of Stockton General Plan:Background Document and Policy Document, <br /> (as amended through November 3, 1998) 1990b. <br /> City of Stockton Community Development Department/Planning Division, Findings, Statement <br /> of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring Program, City of Stockton General <br /> Plan Revision and Infrastructure/Public Facilities Master Plans. Adopted by the City Council <br /> January 22, 1990. <br /> Stockton Sravenger Transfer Station Expansion IV.7 ESA 1990190 <br />