Laserfiche WebLink
V. IMPACT OVERVIEW <br /> use outweigh the lost benefit of materials recovery, and that, for these reasons,the No Project <br /> Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative. CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e) <br /> states that when the No Project Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative the EIR <br /> shall identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives. Because the <br /> Reduced-Scale Alternative would reduce most of the project impacts that were identified,while at <br /> the same time providing for materials recovery and a recycling, it is considered the <br /> environmentally superior alternative. <br /> REFERENCES —Altematives <br /> Federal Aviation Administration(FAA),Airport Environmental Handbook, October 8, 1985. <br /> Ruiz, Dean, Associate Planner, City of Stockton Community Development Department Planning <br /> Division,personal communication, September 30, 1999. <br /> Ruiz, Dean,Associate Planner,City of Stockton Community Development Department Planning <br /> Division,personal communication,January 25, 2000. <br /> Stockton Scavenger Transfer Station Expansion V.7 ESA 1990190 <br />