Laserfiche WebLink
4D ECONOMIC AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION COMPARISON <br /> OF DIRECT HAUL AND TRANSFER ALTERNATIVES <br /> The total annual costs and energy consumption alternatives, itemized <br /> in Table 4-4, are as follows: <br /> Direct Haul (existing operation) $1,694,000 34,695 MMBTU <br /> Direct Dump Transfer System $1,317,000 16,245 MMBTU <br /> Hydraulic Compaction Transfer $1,361,000 17,193 MMBTU <br /> System <br /> It is clear from the totals that implementation of the Direct Dump <br /> Transfer System will (1) considerably reduce costs and energy con- <br /> sumption experienced in the existing Direct Haul System, and (2) be <br /> more cost effective and energy efficient than the Hydraulic Compaction <br /> System. <br /> - 26 - <br />