Laserfiche WebLink
by a state or national ambient air quality standard (except carbon <br /> monoxide, for which the limits are 250 lbs/hr and 2, 500 lbs/day) . <br /> The New Source Review Rule requires that for non-attainment pollu- <br /> tants, the new source must obtain a trade-off with an existing <br /> stationary sources within the same air basin. Trade-offs are ob- <br /> tained through negotiations and must result in sufficient emission <br /> reduction so that the total quantity of specified pollutants is less <br /> than it would be without the new source. EPA and State agencies <br /> hope that this approach will prove effective in reducing overall <br /> emissions without unduly constraining necessary development. <br /> For those pollutants considered in attainment with air quality <br /> standards, best available technology is required as long as the <br /> new source will not cause a violation of, or interfere with, the <br /> attainment or maintenance of ambient air quality standards. <br /> An exemption from the New Source Review Rule is possible for a <br /> facility which represents a significant advance in the development <br /> of a technology offering environmental or public health benefits . <br /> The EPA has issued a ruling to permit construction under this ex- <br /> emption of energy-from-waste recovery facilities that meet indi- <br /> vidual plant emission control requirements even though they might <br /> cause or contribute to violations of ambient air quality standards. <br /> Plant owners would have to show continuing good faith efforts to <br /> offset pollution from other sources in the same area. <br /> In addition, the State Air Resources Board has proposed the estab- <br /> lishment of pollution credit banks within each APCD. <br /> New sources other than resource recovery and cc-generation projects <br /> would be required to contribute to these banks when seeking permit <br /> clearance. Resource recovery and co-generation projects could then <br /> draw from these banks in lieu of attaining trade-offs themselves . <br /> The Air Resources Board is planning a pilot program in the South <br /> Coast Air Basin. r <br /> Most equipment suppliers claim that their systems can meet Federal <br /> and State air emission standards. Because California APCD' s use <br /> test methods that are different from EPA's, test data derived <br /> through EPA methods and interpretations cannot readily be used. <br /> There is no correlation method allowing conversion of the results <br /> of one method to the other. <br /> The State Solid Waste Management Board is pursuing a policy of <br /> funding air emission testing in an effort to generate data appli- <br /> cable to California. Tests are being conducted on two package <br /> - incinerator units (manufactured by Consumat Systems, Inc. , and <br /> Kelley Company) . Preliminary results indicate that these units <br /> can meet regulation if equipped with proper air pollution control <br /> equipment. <br /> Water Usage <br /> Generating steam requires the continuous use of water. For every <br /> 1, 000 pounds of steam produced, 120 gallons of water are needed. <br /> - 37 - <br />