ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Table 3 Summary of Significant Impacts and Mitigation Measures y Sipificant impacts Suggested Afifigafim Mamum Land Use Potential bird hazard from on-site The use of netting, a noise system, or other means to ward off drainage pond to aviation in the area. birds shall be used as required by the Airport Land Use Commission if a bird hazard is identified. Vegetation and Wildlife Resources Potential direct mortality of San Joaquin Conduct preconstruction surveys within 60 days before the start kit fox during construction and ground of construction, and if any kit foxes are found, undertake disturbing activities. precautions specified in Chapter 4.2, Condition 4.2-4 of Final EIR. Cumulative loss of S n's hawk In carrying out the operations of the project, the applicant shall foraging habitat. take no actions which violate the provisions of the California Endangered Species Act or any other laws or regulations pertaining to the protection of the S n's hawk. Compliance with said laws shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant, and the applicant shall agree to indemnify,defend, and hold the County harmless from and against any claim or action by affected State agencies as to the project's compliance with said laws. Potential disturbance to breeding or Conduct preconstruction surveys for burrowing owl, and avoid wintering burrowing owls. adverse impacts on burrowing owls, if present, as specified in Chapter 4.2, Condition 4.2-6, Final EIR. Geology and Geotechnical The proposed project would expose Seismic design shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building workers and project facilities to seismic Code (Seismic Zone 4), as specified in the project's geotechnical hazards. report contained in Appendix F, Final EIR. Excavated and fill slopes at the Proper construction practices, according to the geotechnical proposed project site could fail, causing engineer's recommendations contained in Appendix F, Final injury, damage to facilities, or burying EIR, shall be followed for all new cuts and fills. In areas solid waste material. where slopes are steeper than 2:1, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: regrade slopes to 2:1 or flatter, or set back all improvements at least 30 feet from the top and bottom of the slopes, or erect landslide debris barriers. Existing surface soils are inadequate to Construction of fills, foundations, slabs, and roadways on the support foundations for the proposed site shall be in accordance with the geotechnical engineer's project facilities. recommendations contained in Appendix F, Final EIR. Construction of the proposed project Placement of plastic sheeting, debris fences,silt fences, and/or facilities would promote surface soil hay bales to protect disturbed surfaces during precipitation erosion. events during construction. Following construction, all disturbed surfaces, especially slopes, shall be revegetated. I.:/PROJECf/397/MRF1RSI-1.TCY Revision 1.0 15 December 15, 1993