Laserfiche WebLink
C) <br /> ORRICK,HERRINGTON 8 SUTCLIFFE LLP <br /> 0 ��YrJfJ7 I� THE ORRICK BUILDING <br /> EET <br /> SAN FRANCISCO,405 HOWARD CALIFORNIA94105-2669 <br /> Q R R I C K JUN 0 8 2009 fax 1-415-773-5700 5 <br /> WWW.ORRICK.COM <br /> ENVIRONMENT HEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> June 5, 2009 Joshua D.Watts <br /> (415)773-5909 <br /> jwatts@orrick.com <br /> !=MAIL AND U.S.MAIL <br /> Jared S. Mueller <br /> Porter Scott <br /> A Professional Corporation <br /> UniversityAve-., Suite 200 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95825 <br /> gg Ranch,LLC <br /> Re: Potential Destruction of Evidence by Olivera E <br /> Dear Mr. Mueller: <br /> It came to our attention yesterday that your client, Ohvera Egg Ranch,LLC ("Ohvera"), has been <br /> cleaning the manure lagoons residing on its egg production facility located at 944 and 952 W. <br /> Bowman Road,-French Camp;California 95231 for the past week and is still engaged in the clean up <br /> as of today. As.part of this effort, Olivera is physically removirig•the ifnaniue from the lagoons by <br /> using a large backhoe and using trucks to transport.the'manure offsite. We understaiid that Olivera <br /> is using four to nine men working 12 hours_.a day and employing three large'dumptrucks to <br /> constantly dig and dump a mixture of solids and liquids. Moreover,Plaintiffs observed numerous <br /> brand new PVC piping on the property, about 12 inches in diameter,which appear like they maybe <br /> used to add in a new drainage system or replace an old waste removal system. Ohvera's recent <br /> actions are tantamount to destruction of evidence of which it had and continues to have a duty to <br /> preserve. <br /> Plaintiffs are unaware of such a clean up effort by Olivera in recent time.or that such a practice is a <br /> regulafly conducted activity.'Several individualplaintiffs have lived at 'their current addresses,which <br /> lie in close proximity to Ohvera's property and the lagoons in question, continuously and for years <br /> before Olivera came in during the mid-1990s. Moreover, Ohvera's Manure Management Plan does 1 <br /> not describe the removal of manure from the lagoons. See attached Exhibit A. In fact, Mr. Olivera, <br /> in a response to the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department, stated that the facility <br /> did not need to remove solids from the lagoons because the solids were dispersed by recirculating <br /> pumps and.mechanically dragging a boom across the.ponds. See attached Exhibit A. While <br /> Plaintiffs support Olivera's efforts to regularly clean its property,this recent undertaking is <br /> suspicious in light of our recent request to enter the property�pursuanf to Federal Rule of Civil'f, <br /> Procedure 34 to collect evidence and- erform-scientific=te-sting--oirvarioiis parts of the property, - <br /> including the soil, air and manure lagoons.-• N <br /> On May 22, 2009, exactly two weeks ago, Plaintiffs sent Olivera'a request to enter this specific' <br /> property "for the purposes of inspecting, measuring, surveying, photographing,videotaping, testing <br /> 0135 Wesr.260672401.3 <br />