My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SKIFF
>
23227
>
4454 - Kennel Program
>
PR0515225
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2020 10:37:15 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:19:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4454 - Kennel Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0515225
PE
4454
FACILITY_ID
FA0012074
FACILITY_NAME
HYWINDS LABRADOR RETRIEVERS
STREET_NUMBER
23227
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
SKIFF
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23227 E SKIFF RD
P_LOCATION
06
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
CField
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4454_PR0515225_23227 E SKIFF_.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> (cont. pg. 211 <br /> 4 <br /> All dog food is kept in covered containers to keep rodents out of the food <br /> and to help to keep from attracting rodents. <br /> We were told we would probably have to take out another encroachment <br /> permit and improve our driveway by paving it back to the property line. I <br /> feel I must at least address this issue with a protest. Our home is relatively <br /> new, built within the last five years. At the time we built our home we <br /> paid for an encroachment permit and put in our driveway according to the <br /> county requirements. An inspector from San Joaquin County, your employee, <br /> came out and approved the work done. Attached is a copy of the encroachment <br /> permit we paid for at the time we put in our driveway. Please note the high- <br /> lighted area which states that a road base driveway was acceptable. I feel if <br /> we are not adding anything, for example a new building or a new driveway <br /> entrance, that we should not have to re-pay another encroachment permit fee <br /> on an existing, approved.. driveway entrance. <br /> Also I do not feel we should have to pay a Traffic Impact Fee. It is <br /> not justified as we are not, nor will we be opperating a business. No traffic <br /> has been, or will be added to our street. The dogs on our premises are our <br /> pets and belong to us. We are applying for a kennel as we want to be legal <br /> with the county, not to run a business. <br /> In conclusion, basically we just want to enjoy our dogs and be legal. <br /> If we are not allowed a kennel permit we would be faced with having to sell <br /> our property or distroy many of our older dogs and to find homes for some <br /> of our younger ones. We are not bothering any of our neighbors or running <br /> a business. We would appreciate fair consideration as citizens and taxpayers <br /> in this county. <br /> Sincerel , <br /> Jim Dunlavy <br /> Pat Dunlavy <br /> April 28, 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.