COMPLIANCE INFO - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 5 Letter to Planning Department 1/24/79 B. A quantitative analysis of each possible type Of pollutant or contaminant, in terms of what would reach the water treatment plant intake, under both winter and summer flows . ssible of C® An analysis of the effect or o atment planteffect and each pollutant on the water tpre on the health of the Stocktonians drinking the water. D. An analysis of possible shock lading of P01- lutants . By shock loading it ios meant the pos sibility of a sudden concentration of any pol- lutant or contaminant reaching the water treat- ment intake due, for example , to flooding of Indian Creek. Indian Creek is known to flood irregularly. Many pollutants or contaminants which could be released from this project may not flow directly into Indian Creek but may build up in the soil. In the event of a flood, a massive concentration of that soil-contained buildup could be released suddenly. Similarly, each possible shock loading could result from operator errors . In connection with this, Stockton East Water District notes that the possibility of the one hundred year flood is not adequately discussed in this draft EIR. E. .. mitigation measures proposed or possible for each of the above effects . Thank you very much for the opportunity to submit these comments , and for the opportunity to speak before the Planning Commission on January 18 , 1979 . May we respectfully suggest that the proponents or the environmental consultants feel free to consult with Mr. Robert Sagehorn, the General Manager of Stockton East Water District, at any time. Very truly yo rs, JOHN W. STOVAft for NEUMILLER & BEARDSLEE Attorneys for Stockton East Water District JWS/js cc: Mr. Robert Sagehorn SEWD Board of Dirr -' -)rs