Laserfiche WebLink
Grinding and trommel screening of the material prior to composting has significantly im- <br /> proved the quality of the final compost product. More mechanized processing has included <br /> magnetic and eddy current separation for improved removal of iron and aluminum com- <br /> ponents of the waste stream. The decision on the amount of preprocessing will be deter- <br /> mined by economics and the final use of the compost product. <br /> Semi-solid materials such as grit, sewage sludge, and food processing residue and liquid <br /> wastes such as grease, holding tank pumpings, and septic tank pumpings will be placed on <br /> other materials such as ground green material or wood waste or recycled compost and <br /> mixed as soon as possible to minimize the potential for leachate formation and odors. The <br /> amount of these materials accepted will be limited by the availability of other feed stocks. <br /> Design Alternatives <br /> Alternative 1. Exhibit 4 shows the layout for Windrow composting using a front end <br /> loader to turn the compost piles. Feedstock requiring preprocessing or grinding would be <br /> unloaded and processed in the RRF area. Ground and processed feedstock would be <br /> moved to the composting area using front-end loaders or dump trucks and placed into <br /> rough Windrows. Mixtures will be determined using volumetric proportions. Semi-solid <br /> and liquid feedstocks would be transported to the Windrow area and deposited directly on <br /> the rough Windrows. The quantity added would not exceed the quantity necessary to raise <br /> the moisture content to desirable limits. If semi-solid and liquid feedstocks are not avail- <br /> able, water will be added using a water truck. The rough Windrows would then be mixed <br /> using front- end loaders. After mixing the Windrows would be formed in final configura- <br /> tion approximately 8 feet high and 16 feet wide at the base. Windrows would be turned as <br /> necessary to maintain aerobic conditions and for pathogen reduction in accordance with <br /> CFR 503. Turning of Windrows would be using front end loaders. A 30-foot-wide aisle <br /> is provided between pairs of Windrows to allow access for the front end loader for efficient <br /> turning. Initial turning frequency would depend on the specific mixture being composted, <br /> but would be every 2 to 3 days for mixtures containing MSW, sludge, septic tank pump- <br /> ings, and other highly putresible materials. The turning frequency would be much less for <br /> green material and wood waste; once every 1 to 2 weeks. Later in the process depending <br /> on the composting period, the Windrows would be turned every 2 to 4 weeks. Water <br /> would be added prior to turning as necessary using a water truck to maintain moisture at <br /> the desired levels. The composting period would be 4 to 8 weeks depending on the quality <br /> of the product desired and the initial feedstock composition. Initially, Forward is planning <br /> to proceed with this option. <br /> Alternative 2. Exhibit 5 shows the layout for Windrow composting using a Windrow <br /> turner. The process is the same as described above except a Windrow turner would be <br /> used to mix the feedstocks, create the Windrows, and turn the Windrows. The Windrow <br /> dimensions proposed are 8 feet high and 18 feet wide at the base. The space between <br /> Windrows is 8 feet to provide access for a water truck for water addition and for fire con- <br /> trol. This is Forward's next option if the need for additional composting capacity or the <br /> economics of using a Windrow machine justify the initial cost of the Windrow machine. <br /> wa1OM9N4.wp5/27 <br /> 9/28/94 27 <br /> i <br />