|
�..r -:•k �"- s _..: -f :^ r-:a z. o:-'3 r1' ,.r. ✓.. ;� i- r'.7^- -v;."i;i a '^i trh.Is:,f �gty;r�,s -�.ss`�.,�3 f�h��S'sri�� .r: ;p,r a �•,��I.:
<br /> r 'L}��h- 'r�^. ��ri;�n,,f .�r,: �i t"5`1�"�'S'�f.. vr,:�� ,y���ii,rr+J,�',L.c�� y*Y.�f Via-• 4. 7�:n�,�;�yyyy •�p� �iC}Gr-�" � 5� �.?t,�.m^ of w;':A � ;5�,..: ., ,, ra:;�6r 4 r�' :7.?f�:;�C.S+ry�� .a�L/T
<br /> �,��,s�iL ,��ki`Vr�" rl Al,ry�i,{l�.a�a�'•YYI^ly �4 �'y� �frr�li'>{���1. ';.J��yf�iof4 r.{,y f1+ Vr;�a�+r�: �rx1•yrr1� M �. � .+'�A a^_ �r }'nyi�+.' r:l��h".fx ':i• ��R�,
<br /> .x:: �a ;_� ,a 7„ tir r•�,�,h��r�..:;,��r`7 nri��� - +�.�`'-�;,��11�'r, s�e���S".. �� "ice 1� .f.�� r��ri�
<br /> W
<br /> s
<br /> f t� �}f ✓ ..�. .. tr7 r. S,dw ,ui��, Y z' n� n 7, fL.Y'"_.,. :4#✓ .� v..C� '
<br /> -
<br /> 5�''r'*/��',k,�f•'� 4 ,k'3^�' 1 Ff1�' t � r�.!°t Nu �_._a�7t.L'fn�lt�iJd M�.yl',�'�3i x 9� .:.,S+x��J�G1t1aJ�•'�s � } iw-.ew
<br /> n
<br /> t
<br /> i
<br /> a
<br /> r
<br /> r
<br />�f
<br /> r
<br /> i
<br /> 3
<br /> 1 p S
<br /> waV tracks at the bottom of tlse trench dug to rernnve the p e
<br /> connect i n g the. tan). and the• wtarehousc .
<br /> Results of the tests .are tabulated and discuss.:d a later
<br /> paragraph.
<br /> 01
<br /> or t
<br /> The exca"�.Eion was later filled :t'ith e %itcsjslby ltP
<br /> s11ovnin1 figures
<br /> Stockton. the current aphc`arance of the
<br /> 6 and 7 .
<br /> E3ccausc Borne sn) I c_ontarnination 'uas fo{urlthcrt.vork11 C e-is re4usts jrecl
<br /> which will be disr.ussed later hcrcrn,
<br /> to define the problem.
<br /> On hiarc:) 26, E9&9 a "Soil Rc-Excavation CCrorl. Plan"' was submitted
<br /> to the 53LHD b}' 3TO•
<br /> In a letter dated h4ay /+ , 1959 (Apo, A-g) J the j3t-Hrl added sev-
<br /> eral items that needed to be addressed in the work p
<br /> I an . 'Sh(_sC
<br /> i terns were either trddecl to g i venr i n Append i xr sAu7sedAccor d MFdrts
<br /> pages . The amended plan is g
<br /> 3T0, verbal persrsission was riven to implement the proposed rc--
<br /> excavation plan.
<br /> ad
<br /> e
<br /> The railroad tics between � ithrthccrailstbei+ngr�left
<br /> thtnoplsrcce
<br /> load i ng dock wcr e r enloved,
<br /> Permission from the various railroads involved had hcen ohta+n-
<br /> ed• :n
<br /> This area ( the pipeline route) was then excavated to
<br /> -et deep (Firs . 5h) .
<br /> approxirnate 12 feet x l0 fezt x
<br /> S f 4 h
<br /> rorn five
<br /> On Ju 10, 1989 Canonic Labs collected dot�blahove lAllfsampling
<br /> locations in the second excavation descri u a I i t y control f4f'
<br /> The samolcs were
<br /> was witnessed by a rcpresentativc of tfJe � dis-
<br /> procedures as described above were foll- 35501 GCFID. A
<br /> tested far f3TX (pYep• 5030) and TE-11H (1 p•
<br /> eussion of the results i , given under Tests Re5LsboutlttwoinMon ths
<br /> laced was judged to be
<br /> All clean soil was returned to the pit by ATO
<br /> atter rile tests were run• theczepts reil sults and inspection by
<br /> free of contamination by
<br /> sight and smell . � +,
<br /> pn Oct . 3, 19b9 , the DHCS sent a fetter to the Port of io�low�d
<br /> regarding health protection procedures that should be
<br /> (App• A- 12) .
<br /> made answering all concerns expressed 6y the DHS,
<br /> hui
<br /> 1CtrJ. 3 . & Associates
<br /> that a proper
<br /> response
<br /> 3TO informed Hunter
<br /> had been
<br /> no written data could be 'Iotsnd.
<br /> 4
<br />
|