Laserfiche WebLink
ErniQ's General Store - 2 - 22 November 2011 <br /> 4407 E. Waterloo Rd., Stock 40 <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> In September 2001, two grab groundwater samples from borings B2 and B3 were analyzed, <br /> and both samples were reportedly impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons. In July 2003, four <br /> groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4) were installed, followed by MW-5 in <br /> December 2006. Groundwater monitoring was conducted quarterly from August 2003 until <br /> July 2008, when semi-annual sampling was approved by the SJCEHD. Groundwater <br /> monitoring ceased in May 2010. A history of groundwater monitoring results can be seen on <br /> attached Table 3. While groundwater monitoring has shown a trend of increases and <br /> decreases since 2005, the maximum peak concentrations have declined to less than 33% of <br /> their 2005 maximum concentration since 2008 (Graph 1). The minimum concentrations from <br /> 2008-2010 have declined approximately an order of magnitude lower than the prior minimum <br /> concentrations in 2006-2007, indicating that mass reductions are occurring at a slow rate <br /> through natural attenuation. Groundwater monitoring has shown that the groundwater plume <br /> is stable and slowly declining. While water levels have risen in recent years, there is no clear <br /> correlation between rising water levels and groundwater concentrations (Graph 1). <br /> A November 2007 cone penetrometer testing (CPT) grab groundwater sampling (CPT1 and <br /> CPT2) did not report groundwater contamination from 88' bgs to 115' bgs. Maximum grab <br /> groundwater concentrations in 2001, and maximum August 2005 and final May 2010 <br /> groundwater monitoring concentrations (MW-4) are listed below in Table 2. <br /> Table 2 Maximum Groundwater Sample Concentrations' <br /> Date TPHg benzene toluene eth (benzene xylenes MTBE TBA DCA <br /> 9/4/2001 8,300 8.5 150 120 1,300 29 <13 6.2 <br /> grab sample <br /> 8/17/2005 15,000 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 9,900 3,700 29 <br /> monitoring <br /> 5/7//2010 <50 NA NA NA NA 36 <10 <0.5 <br /> monitoring <br /> 1 =concentrations given in micrograms per Liter(ug/L) 2=sample taken 5/11/2005 <br /> In December 2006, six soil vapor extraction (SVE) wells (SV-1 through SV-6)were installed as <br /> an interim remedial measure, and an SVE pilot study was conducted. The shallow SVE wells <br /> pilot study was reported as successful, while the deep SVE wells failed to remove an adequate <br /> volume of soil vapor to constitute a successful test. Due to declining peak concentrations in <br /> monitoring wells with the stable MTBE plume near the USTs, Regional Board staff met with <br /> the consultant in April 2010 and agreed to postpone implementation of SVE, pending <br /> additional groundwater sampling and completion of a soil vapor survey. In September 2010, a <br /> soil vapor intrusion study was conducted by advancing and sampling seven shallow borings <br /> (V1 through V7). Maximum soil vapor concentrations for TPHg, 3,600 micrograms per cubic <br /> meter (ug/m3), benzene, 5.4 ug/m3, toluene 7.6 ug/m3, and xylenes, 10 ug/m passed the <br /> residential and commercial San Francisco Bay Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) and <br /> commercial California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs). <br /> Risk Assessment <br /> As stated above, a soil vapor investigation was conducted in September 2010, which passed <br /> the ESLs for residential and commercial use, and CHHSLs for commercial use. Soil <br /> concentrations failed the ESLs for gross contamination and direct exposure; however, the <br /> consultant states that the most contaminated soil is located at least 50' from any building <br />