My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012262
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
101
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541653
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012262
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2020 11:25:10 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 8:59:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012262
RECORD_ID
PR0541653
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0023871
FACILITY_NAME
TOP FILLING STATION
STREET_NUMBER
101
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15125307
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
101 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 March 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0130 <br /> Page 21 of 23 <br /> ' be between85 <br /> $ ,000 and $140,000 However, monitoring costs will vary depending upon regulatory <br /> ' requirements Additional inoculation events may be required to attain clean-up goals, which could <br /> significantly increase the total cost of the project <br /> Typical costs for monthly monitoring of an in-situ bioremediation system, in addition to standard <br /> quarterly sampling, would be between $1,500 00 and $3,000 00 per month Based on a one to two <br /> year treatment period, the total cost for in-situ bioremediation at the site would be between $100,000 <br /> ' and $200,000 <br /> 8.0. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REMEDIATION OF HYDROCARBON- <br /> IMPACTED SOEL <br /> ' 8 1 FURTHER ASSESSMENT OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL <br /> Additional hydrocarbon-impacted soil may be present northwest of the former UST area and north <br /> of the site, on the former Wells Fargo property Several additional soil borings should be considered t <br /> for these areas to determine the lateral extent of impacted soil west of the UST area and north of the <br /> site <br /> ' 8 2 HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL REMEDIATION <br /> Vadose-zone contamination at the site is present in the immediate vicinity of the former UST <br /> ' excavation from depths of approximately 15 to 55 feet bsg However, "smear zone" contamination <br /> at the site is laterally more extensive, extending off-site north of the property <br /> ' Based upon feasibility studies and analysis performed at the site, we recommend an SVE system at <br /> the site The effectiveness of the SVE system should be evaluated on a semi-annual basis Based upon <br /> the relatively low flow rates measured during the SVE pilot test and the silty-clayey soil present at <br /> the site, a unit capable of at least 250 scfin will be required for remediation A thermal oxidation SVE <br /> unit will be the most cost-effective choice Vapor extraction at the site should be conducted in <br /> conjunction with ground water remediation (IAS) <br /> Additional SVE wells, with multiple screened intervals will be required at the site The wells should <br /> be screened only within zones of contaminated soil These wells have approximately 5 feet of screen <br /> above ground water and can be utilized to extract sparged vapors <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.