My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012267
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
101
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541653
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012267
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2020 12:33:38 AM
Creation date
7/9/2020 9:02:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012267
RECORD_ID
PR0541653
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0023871
FACILITY_NAME
TOP FILLING STATION
STREET_NUMBER
101
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15125307
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
101 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vapors using a PID The readings were recorded on the boring logs The soil was then <br /> described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (see Boring Logs, <br />' Appendix A) <br /> 3.3 Well Completion <br />' Borings MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 were completed as groundwater monitoring wells using <br /> a 0 020-inch slotted 2-inch diameter PVC casing from 60 to 80 feet Blank PVC casing was <br />' installed from 60 feet to surface grade The filter pack (#3 lonestar sand) was installed from <br /> 57 to 80 feet Each well was developed by using a surge block to set the filter pack Two feet <br /> of bentonite pellets were placed and hydrated on the filter pack Each well was then grouted <br />' to the surface with Portland cement <br /> 3.4 Monitoring Well Sampling <br />' On January 17, 1995, groundwater depths in all wells were measured relative to the top of <br /> the casing using a Solinst water level meter The relative prezometrrc levels and hydraulic <br />' gradient were determined from these data (Table 1) <br /> After groundwater depths were measured, a PVC bailer was used to purge standing water <br />' from each well Approximately 10 gallons of water were removed to stabilize temperature, <br /> pH and conductivity (Appendix B) Stabilization parameters were measured at one-gallon <br /> intervals using an ICM water analyzer Purge water was placed in 55-gallon DOT drums and <br /> stored on-site <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from each well using a new, disposable plastic bailer <br />' Samples were collected in 40-m1 EPA vials, placed in a chilled container, and transported <br /> to Pan-Ag for analysis <br /> 3.5 Monitoring Well Surveying <br /> The casing elevations of the three monitoring wells were surveyed relative to an arbitrary <br /> reference point The relative elevations were then calculated Casing elevations for all wells <br /> are included in Table I <br /> 3.6 Laboratory Analysis of Soil and Water Samples <br /> Thirty soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH as gasoline) and <br /> volatile aromatics(BTE&X) in accordance with EPA methods 8015m and 8020, respectively. <br /> Selected soil samples were analyzed for total lead in accordance with EPA method 6010 <br /> Each water sample was analyzed for total lead, TPH as gasoline and BTE&X in accordance <br /> with EPA methods 6010, 8015m and 602, respectively <br /> ti <br /> I <br /> Cleabyeal Add Serving lee <br /> ITop FW-Z PIEWF050.e 1993 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.