Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HZALTH SEICr-j - <br /> V ,aQp �o <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br /> Karen Furst, M.D., M.P.H., Health Of: icer <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor • Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> 2091468-3420 FILE C <br /> JAMES GIOTTONINI APR 12 1999 <br /> PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR <br /> CITY OF STOCKTON <br /> 425 N EL DORADO <br /> STOCKTON CA 95202 <br /> RE: City of Stockton sites in the Local Oversight Program <br /> A meeting was held on March 29, 1999 at the office of San Joaquin County Public Health <br /> Services, Environmental Health Division (PHSIEHD). Representatives from the City of Stockton <br /> were you and John Fukomoto. PHS/E--HD representativ s were Margaret Lagorio, Ron Rowe and <br /> Jeff Wong. The following is a summary of the site discussions and follow up comments by <br /> PHSIEHD. <br /> Fontana Drive at Smith Canal <br /> The monitoring well that previously had free product no longer has measurable product <br /> that can be removed by the skimmer that was i stalled. There is still sheen on the water <br /> so a groundwater sample has not been collected for lab analysis. PHSIEHD <br /> recommended you discuss with your consultant methods of showing the plume is stable <br /> and declining (i.e. high volume purging to see if the sheen diminishes and a groundwater <br /> sample can be collected for analysis). <br /> 110 W.Sonora <br /> The vapor extraction pilot test that was to be performed in November 1998, couldn't be <br /> performed because of a problem with vapor well V2 which had to be destroyed. A test is <br /> now scheduled for April 22, 1999. Once feasibility test have been conducted a Corrective <br /> Action Plan can be prepared and submitted to HSIEHD. <br /> 1740 Houston <br /> Monitoring well (MW) 3 has been located. Qua terly sampling of all the monitoring wells is <br /> to occur, including MW3 . if the analytical resul s of the water from MW3 indicates the <br /> well is still viable, then the work plan for installa ion of two additional monitoring wells can <br /> be enacted. <br /> 6803 Alexandria <br /> PHSIEHD requested concurrence on closure of this site from the Central Valley Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB). Their 30 day response time is over and there <br /> has been no response. A monitoring well destruction plan, a permit application and $89 <br /> permit fee should be submitted to PHSIEHD. After the monitoring well has been <br /> destroyed, a"no further action required"letter will be prepared by PHSIEHD. <br /> 1116 First <br /> Two additional monitoring wells have been inst [led. A report of this work is to be <br /> submitted to PHSIEHD for comment. <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Ifealth Care Services <br />