My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PR0535342
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MACARTHUR
>
29425
>
4700 - Waste Tire Program
>
PR0535342
>
PR0535342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2020 5:32:38 PM
Creation date
7/22/2020 8:36:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4700 - Waste Tire Program
RECORD_ID
PR0535342
PE
4740
FACILITY_ID
FA0020390
FACILITY_NAME
RENEWED RESOURCES CORP
STREET_NUMBER
29425
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MACARTHUR
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25312026
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
29425 S MACARTHUR RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
该页面上没有批注。
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10992
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PANOCHE BURN SITE REMEDIATION <br /> 3.6 Soil Tests <br /> In August 1996, the CIWMB requested Sukut to determine the physical properties of the <br /> native soil. The results indicated the onsite soils were sandy lean clay (CL) with a plasticity <br /> index of 16 to 20. The percent fine passing the No. 200 sieve was 55 to 60 and the percent <br /> passing the No. 30 sieve was 90 and 78. Based on these initial soil tests, the CIWMB <br /> engineer accepted the soil as a suitable low permeability cover and material for the <br /> check dam. <br /> On November 21, 1996, three additional soil samples were collected. The purpose of the <br /> second round of sampling was to verify the original soil samples and further define the on- <br /> site soils. Each soil sample was analyzed for moisture content, sieve analysis, Atterberg <br /> Limits, maximum density-optimum moisture content, and permeability. <br /> Each soil sample was taken from distinct areas. Sample No. 1 was taken directly from the <br /> barrier layer, Sample No. 2 was collected at the retention dam, and Sample No. 3 was col- <br /> lected from a stockpile of soil, which was used to construct the retention dam. The samples <br /> were classified using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). All of the soils were <br /> sandy lean clay (CL). The moisture content, plasticity index, maximum density, optimum <br /> moisture, and permeability (hydraulic conductivity) are summarized in Table 9. Copies of <br /> these soil tests are included in Appendix M. <br /> CIWMB 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.