PR0535342 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

OUR squirrel activity present. Burrows, and much of the entire Site, were investigated for sign indicating the presence of kit fox, including scat and prey remains. Spotlighting was conducted for three consecutive evenings after dark, using a 1,000,000 candle- power spotlight. Existing roads within the Site allowed LFR biologists to observe the Site and the general area surrounding the Site. Six"scent stations" were set up for the last night following a lack of activity noted during the previous nights (Figure 2 and Photograph #5). A quadrant of tracking medium with a scent lure was placed in a level area, usually close to a game trail or other potentially luring feature (i.e. burrow complex). All scent stations were photo-documented and checked early the next morning for tracks. Weather conditions during the surveys included daytime temperatures ranging from 85 to 103 degrees Fahrenheit. Temperatures at night were approximately 80 degrees Fahrenheit. Conditions were mild with little to no wind and excellent visibility.Nikon 8x40 roof prism binoculars were used to scan the Site for kit fox, prey mammals, and other signs that might indicate their presence. Field notes documenting observations from the survey were maintained and digital photographs of significant Site features were taken. Potentially suitable kit fox habitat within 150 meters of the Site boundary on adjoining properties was also surveyed. Results and Conclusions The Site presents suitable habitat for kit fox, however, the pre-construction survey conducted by LFR wildlife biologists did not indicate evidence for kit fox presence at the Site at this time. The Site appears to have adequate habitat as required by kit fox; there is at least one nearby water source and the available prey base appears to be adequate. Previous Site investigations conducted by LFR biologists indicated kit fox occurrence within the project boundary; numerous tracks were found during the Site visit on January 31, 2003, matching literature based kit fox dimensions$. Tracks found during the pre-construction survey described in this letter report were potentially kit fox, but were too washed out for certainty (Photograph# 6). If kit fox left the tracks, they date back to the previous rain event in the area(several months ago) when the soil was moist. The CNDDB search of the Tracy quadrangle indicates numerous reports of kit fox observations in proximity to the Site (locations suppressed). Kit fox may use the project area as a corridor to nearby water sources or for foraging. There are various shooting targets set up at the Site and hundreds of spent shot-gun shells on the ground surface indicating that people have been using the Site for target shooting purposes. In addition, LFR biologists observed at least two unleashed domestic dogs roaming the Site during the day. No kit fox or other candid tracks were observed at burrows dusted with tracking medium. Tracks observed at burrows included; kangaroo rat, beetle, and ground squirrel. Tracks observed at scent $Peterson,R. 1474.Animal Tracks.Houghton Mifflin Press,New York. SJ Kt Fx Srvy Rpt(draft2):L 4