Laserfiche WebLink
It may be necessary to create fire breaks and/or access routes into the pile. These <br /> should be at least 18 m (60 ft) wide or wider if high winds are a factor. Also, as the piles <br /> tend to be unstable, sturdy platforms should be provided to fire fighters who are operating <br /> atop the pile. Wooden pallets work well for this purpose. <br /> The summaries of several Guidelines issues presented above only address a small <br /> portion of the issues and problems of preventing and fighting a tire fire. To effectively <br /> protect public health, safety, and property, a fire-fighting management team trained to <br /> deal with tire fires should be in charge of planning and execution of such an event. <br /> 2.6 TIRE FIRE "TARGET" COMPOUNDS <br /> Recognizing the dangers to health and environment associated with tire fires, the <br /> Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department (TPCHD) conducted a study on hazardous <br /> airborne chemical compounds. TPCHD published a report that identified, through a series <br /> of screening steps, a subset of 34 target compounds (weighted based on toxicity and <br /> expected ambient air concentrations) that should be considered for air monitoring during a <br /> tire fire (Adolfson Associates, 1994). <br /> There is a potential for a wide range of health effects from exposure to the <br /> hydrocarbons, metals, and inorganic gases and vapors identified. The health effects <br /> include irritation of the skin, eyes, and mucous membranes, central nervous system <br /> depression, respiratory effects, and cancer. <br /> In developing the target list, the authors gathered air monitoring data collected by <br /> EPA at nine tire fire locations (Wisconsin, Washington, Virginia, Arkansas, Colorado, <br /> North Carolina, New York, Pennsylvania, and Utah), as well as the data from the test burn <br /> discussed earlier in this report (Ryan, 1989; Lemieux and DeMarini, 1992). Compounds <br /> identified as either a suspected or confirmed human carcinogen were automatically listed <br /> as target compounds, regardless of recorded air concentration or emission level. As a <br /> group, PAHs in low concentration were not singled out, and CTPV was used to represent <br /> the PAH class of compounds. Individual PAHs with a concentration high enough to qualify <br /> as a target compound (see below) were listed separately, however. <br /> The compounds were also evaluated based on whether their maximum measured <br /> airborne concentration exceeded 33% of the TLV for that compound. If so, the compound <br /> was considered a target compound. Thirty-three percent of the TLV was used, to <br /> approximate an equivalent worker inhalation dosage, because exposure to a tire fire could <br /> occur 24-hours per day, as opposed to the 8-hours that the TLV is based upon. <br /> The last evaluation criteria the authors applied was to compare the ratio of detected <br /> value to the subchronic and chronic inhalation reference concentrations (RfQ. The RfC is <br /> an estimate of the exposure concentration that would not result in appreciable risk of <br /> adverse health effects. Compounds were ordered by decreasing ratios (e.g., of detected <br /> concentration to subchronic RfQ. Target compounds were determined by selecting the top <br /> 25% of compounds from each data set. <br /> 23 <br />