Laserfiche WebLink
Excavation Treatments <br /> UST Excavation Treatment on a <br /> Farm in Wisconsin Figure 3: ram Site in Wisconsin <br /> Approximately 2,000 tons of petroleum-contaminated <br /> soil was excavated from USI'basins on a Wisconsin farm. � ��� ��\ wa <br /> 325ounds of ORC was added to backfill material to <br /> p sc � <br /> accelerate the aerobic bioremediation of the residual ` c��� <br /> `i•^S& `'R"��<eti<`. `LD` `tv w �F� x "@T<C�A@af�'f <br /> groundwater contamination.Changes in TPHg and BTEXMklo <br /> concentrations following the ORC application are shown <br /> in Figure 3. Following 212 days the TPHg declined 68a/o � m�, � ' " `- ~'_ <br /> from 461 ppb to 147 ppb and BTEX levels decreased 82a/o �, \;`""` � _ AII� ` <br /> from 313 ppb to 56 ppb. <br /> UST Excavation Treatment at a <br /> Petroleum Distribution Terminal in Wisconsin REDUCTION <br /> Petroleum-contaminated soils were excavated from a x a f <br /> petroleum distribution terminal. 1,650 pounds of ORC K • ` , �ssric�� � <br /> was placed at the bottom of the excavation area before <br /> backfilling. Monitoring results showed that, after 260 <br /> days, TPHd concentrations within the application area <br /> went from 2,016 to 469 ppb, a decrease of 77%. <br /> Monitoring of TPHd ended at 260 days. After 462 days, <br /> BTEX concentrations went from 38.6 to 7.2 ppb, a — \ 'x .. �� r <br /> ♦ ` � � ztn <br /> decrease of 81%. Figure 4 shows changes in TPHd and <br /> BTEX concentrations over time. <br /> Permeable Reactive Barriers <br /> ORC Permeable Barrier treatment zone indicated that DO was being released into <br /> for Plume Control in Canada the groundwater. Analysis of BTEX compounds also indi- <br /> BTEX contamination was controlled effectively in an cated that aerobic biodegradation reactions were occurring. <br /> ORC barrier in Canada. A series of eight, 4 inch diameter BTEX-contaminated groundwater was treated to levels <br /> wells were installed at the front of the plume, each contain- below the drinking water standards for seven months,which is <br /> ing 10 feet of ORC socks. Groundwater was shallow and consistmtwith ORC's known longevity range.Maintainingthe <br /> flowed in an unconfined silty, En -grained sand aquifer at barrierwith two soda change-outs peryearwould cost 57,500. <br /> approximately 3 feet per day. _ - 10_ <br /> Prior to the installation of the ORC barrier system, four- - oils <br /> teen bundle-style piezometers were installed downgradient <br /> at five discrete depths.With reference to the data presented ,� <br /> in Table 1, four months following the installation of the ^"♦w'h .\ °ss�. ��,. Q�.: <br /> ORC barrier, measurements of Eh and DO at monitoring <br /> points at the front, within and downgradient of the ORC ����Q o� \�p` lxa , ��" <br />