My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012175
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
102
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545890
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012175
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2020 12:17:07 PM
Creation date
7/22/2020 11:23:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012175
RECORD_ID
PR0545890
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0025958
FACILITY_NAME
ROEK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
102
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15502065
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
102 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE 3-4 CONTD. COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION <br /> TECHNOLOGIES <br /> TechnologyDescription <br /> Advantages Disadvantages <br /> Groundwater Plume control by Prevents off-site Requires knowledge of <br /> Contamination installation of a series migration of the extent of <br /> -{ � Control On-Site of hydraulic contaminants Separates contamination and flow <br /> 'treatment <br /> bamers(e g. slurry wall, contaminated and non conditions Physical <br /> etc.) to retard contaminated barriers are very <br /> contaminant migration groundwater. Isolated expensive, and subject <br /> groundwater quality can to weathering Long- <br /> be improved by term maintenance and <br /> naturally occurring inspection casts <br /> bioremediation expected Difficult to <br /> monitor the <br /> effectiveness of <br /> naturally occurring <br /> remediation process <br /> 3.3.2 Applicable Remedial Technologies <br /> Based on the preliminary comparison of remedial technologies presented in Tables 3-3 <br /> and 3-4, groundwater extraction and vapor extraction are the alternatives to mitigate <br /> migration of contaminated groundwater plume are applicable at the 102 S Wilson Way <br /> site <br /> 3.3.3 Remedial Action Plan <br /> As described above, the remedial options most applicable to the 102 S. Wilson Way site <br /> are dual groundwater and vapor extraction as the preferred remedial alternatives High <br /> vacuum dual extraction combines elements of these activities Dual extraction removes <br /> contaminated groundwater and volatalizes contaminated soil in the unsaturated zone and <br /> capillary fringe Eiodegradation is enhanced through the addition of nutrients to the <br /> groundwater. For this estimate, we assume that the Knowles will implement dual <br /> extraction We estimate cleanup will take about 3 years. <br /> Estimates of capital, and operating and maintenance costs for the installation and long <br /> term maintenance of groundwater extraction is summarized in Table 3-5. <br /> 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.