Laserfiche WebLink
iDuring the second quarter 2004, GRO, benzene, and MTBE were not reported in wells MW-2 and MW-7. <br /> GRO and benzene were also not reported in wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-9, and MW-10. Benzene was not <br /> reported in well MW-5. DIPE (1.1 µgll-)was reported in well MW-9. 1,2-DCA was reported in wells MW-7 <br /> (2.1 pg/L), MW-8 (34 gg/L), MW-9 (5.3 lig/L), and MW-10 (1.1 µg&). TBA, ETBE, TAME, EDB, or ethanol <br /> were not reported in any of the wells. <br /> During the second quarter 2004, the average DO levels in observation wells (MW-3 through MW-10) <br /> varied in the range of 0.9 mg/L to 10.1 mg/L, while the average DO levels in background monitoring wells <br /> (MW-1 and MW-2)were in the range of 1.1 mg/L to 1.7 mg/L. During the second quarter 2004, higher DO <br /> levels in the range of 4.8 to 12.3 were observed in wells MW-7 and MW-9 (located approximately 10 feet <br /> from the injection point). Changes in COD and TOC concentrations appear to correspond to GRO <br /> concentrations indicating biochemical activity in the subsurface (see Figures 11 and 12). A consistent <br /> correlation of heterotrophic plate counts corresponding to changes in petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations or DO levels was not observed during the second quarter 2004. <br /> Based on the field and laboratory data collected to date, the ozone injection system appears to be <br /> supplying ozone and oxygen to the subsurface as designed. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> This report was prepared in general accordance with accepted standards of care that existed at the time <br /> this work was performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made. Conclusions and <br /> recommendations are based on field observations and data obtained from this work and previous <br /> investigations. It should be recognized that definition and evaluation of geologic conditions is a difficult <br /> and inexact art. Judgments leading to conclusions and recommendations are generally made with an <br /> incomplete knowledge of the subsurface conditions present. More extensive studies may be performed to <br /> reduce uncertainties. This report is solely for the use and information of our client unless otherwise noted. <br /> ATTACHMENTS: <br /> • Table 1 Groundwater Elevation and Analytical Summary <br /> • Table 2 Groundwater Analytical Results for Oxygenates and Additional Compounds <br /> • Table 3 Monitoring Plan Summary <br /> • Table 4 Physical Parameter Summary <br /> • Table 5 Analytical Parameter Summary <br /> • Figure 1 Site Location Map <br /> • Figure 2 Site Plan <br /> • Figure 3 Groundwater Elevation Contour Map (Second Quarter 2004) <br /> • Figure 4 Groundwater Analytical Summary (Second Quarter 2004) <br /> • Figure 5 DO Variation With Time (MW-1, MW-2, MW-5, MW-7, and MW-9) <br /> • Figure 6 GRO, Benzene, MTBE Variation with Time at MW-4 <br /> • Figure 7 GRO, Benzene, MTBE Variation with Time at MW-5 <br /> • Figure 8 GRO, Benzene, MTBE Variation with Time at MW-6 <br /> • Figure 9 GRO, Benzene, MTBE Variation with Time at MW-7 <br /> • Figure 10 GRO, Benzene, MTBE Variation with Time at MW-8 <br /> • Figure 11 COD, TOC, GRO Variation with Time at well MW-4 <br /> • Figure 12 COD, TOC, GRO Variation with Time at well MW-6 <br /> • Appendix A Field Data Sheets <br /> • Appendix B Sampling and Analysis Procedures <br /> • Appendix C Certified Analytical Reports with Chain-of-Custody Documentation and EDF <br /> Verification <br /> PABp-Arco for URS154691Quarterly120041Arco_5469_2QO4,doe 5TKA7"U3 <br />