My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M m <br /> C) Table 2-2 <br /> Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> U„ Significance Significance <br /> 3 Impacts Before Mitigation Measures After <br /> v Mitigation Mitigation <br /> 4.1 Land Use and Agricultural Resources <br /> 4.1-1: Potential for Division of an Established Community. LTS No mitigation is necessary. LTS <br /> The project would not develop a new use that would extend into <br /> an established community or interfere with existing vehicular or <br /> pedestrian traffic moving from one side of an established <br /> community to another.The project would result in the <br /> construction of wastewater treatment facilities on City-owned <br /> land and underground pipelines primarily within City right-of- <br /> way.Interim and permanent pumping stations would be <br /> integrated with new or existing residential subdivisions. <br /> Therefore,this impact would be less than significant. <br /> 4.1-2: Potential Conflicts with Existing Land Uses in or LTS No mitigation is necessary. LTS <br /> Adjacent to the Project Area.WQCF improvements would be <br /> constructed within and near the existing WQCF footprint on <br /> N City-owned property.The wastewater collection system, <br /> recycled-water distribution system,and outfall pipelines <br /> associated with the proposed project would be installed below <br /> grade and would have no effect on adjacent land uses.Interim <br /> and permanent pumping stations would be mainly below grade <br /> and would be integrated with surrounding land uses.Therefore, <br /> the project would not result in land use conflicts between the <br /> project area and adjacent land uses.This impact would be less <br /> p than significant. <br /> v 4.1-3: Conversion of Important Farmland to S 4.1-3: Conversion of Important Farmland to Nonagricultural SU <br /> Nonagricultural Use.Implementation of the proposed project Use.The City will pay the required City agricultural mitigation fee to <br /> o would result in the conversion of approximately 41 acres of help offset the conversion of Important Farmland.Consistent with <br /> CD <br /> Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance to Chapter 13.42 of the Manteca Municipal Code,a$2,000 agricultural <br /> nonagricultural use. Conversion of agricultural land would be mitigation fee will be assessed for every acre of Important Farmland <br /> W considered a significant impact. that would be developed as part of the proposed project.A total of <br /> $82,000($2,000 multiplied by 41 acres)will be made available to <br /> acquire farmland conservation easements and/or farmland deed <br /> 0 v restrictions.Consistent with goals of the City's Right to Farm <br /> ordinance,this mitigation measure would reduce the occurrence of <br /> v conflicts between nonagricultural and agricultural land uses from <br /> Cn development pressure by preserving agricultural lands located within <br /> 0 m the project vicinity. <br /> CO �u <br /> LTS=Less than Significant S=Significant PS=Potentially Significant SU=Significant and Unavoidable <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.