Laserfiche WebLink
M m <br /> X p <br /> > Table 2-2 <br /> Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> CD <br /> W Significance Significance <br /> C <br /> 3 Impacts Before Mitigation Measures After <br /> Mitigation Mitigation <br /> Relocations of PG&E's electric transmission and substation facilities <br /> (50,000 volts and above)could also require formal approval from <br /> CPUC.If required,this approval process could take up to 2 years to <br /> complete.The City will consult with PG&E for additional <br /> information and assistance in the development of its project schedule <br /> to reduce effects on utility service associated with project <br /> development. <br /> 4.11 Transportation and Circulation <br /> 4.11-1:Increased Vehicle Trips or Traffic Congestion LTS No mitigation is necessary. LTS <br /> During Construction.The project would generate up to 180 <br /> one-way construction-related vehicle trips per day associated <br /> with construction of the proposed WQCF improvements and up <br /> to 114 one-way construction-related vehicle trips associated with <br /> construction of proposed pipelines and pumping stations over <br /> Nthe course of the planning period.Construction-related WQCF, <br /> pipeline,and pumping station trips would represent <br /> approximately 1.60/6-7%of existing traffic volumes on area <br /> roadways. These trips would be temporary and would cease once <br /> project construction is complete,would not substantially degrade <br /> existing levels of service,and would not increase congestion at <br /> CD <br /> nearby intersections.Therefore,the project's construction- <br /> related traffic impacts would be less than significant. <br /> T 4.11-2: Potential Increase in Long-Term Operational LTS No mitigation is necessary. LTS <br /> Traffic.The project would generate 20 additional one-way <br /> 0 employee passenger vehicle trips per day and less than one truck <br /> o haul trip per day(approximately two truck haul trips per week). <br /> CD These trips represent less than 1.0%of existing traffic volumes <br /> on local roadways and would not decrease the LOS of these <br /> roadways. Therefore,long-term operational traffic impacts <br /> would be less than significant. <br /> 4.11-3: Potential for Inadequate Parking Capacity. LTS No mitigation is necessary. LTS <br /> m Implementation of the proposed project would result in the <br /> creation of a small demand for additional parking spaces during <br /> v the regular working shift at the WQCF.However,adequate <br /> mm space is available at the WQCF site for additional parking <br /> v Ai <br /> LTS=Less than Significant S=Significant PS=Potentially Significant SU=Significant and Unavoidable <br />