My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006889- CASE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
345
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506426
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006889- CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2020 11:15:11 AM
Creation date
7/27/2020 9:43:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006889- CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0506426
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007416
FACILITY_NAME
STEPHENS MARINE INC
STREET_NUMBER
345
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13526011
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
345 N YOSEMITE ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 04 June 1999 <br /> AGE-NC Protect No. 97-0351 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials containing 0 5 ml hydrochloric acid <br /> ' (18%) as a sample preservative Additional sample from wells MW-1 and MW-2 was transferred <br /> into chilled 1-liter amber bottles The samples were labeled Individually and placed In a chilled <br /> container and transported under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI), a <br /> California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified analytical laboratory located In Pacheco, <br /> California Each sample was analyzed in accordance with <br /> ' a EPA Method 8015m for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g), <br /> EPA Method 8020 for volatile aromatic compounds (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and <br /> ' total xylenes BTEX) and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), <br /> • EPA Method 8260m for dl-isopropyl ether(DIPS),ethyl tertiary butyl ether(ETBE),methyl <br /> ' tertiary butyl ether(MTBE),tertiary amyl methyl ether(TAME) and tertiary butyl alcohol <br /> (TBA) <br /> Two water samples from wells MW-1 and MW-2 were also analyzed In accordance with <br /> EPA Method 8015m for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel (TPH-d) <br /> ' 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water flow direction and gradient were determined from field measurements, hydrocarbon <br /> Impact on ground water was assessed from results of laboratory analysis <br /> 3 1 RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The relative elevation of ground water In each well was calculated by subtracting the ground water <br /> depth from the surveyed relative casing elevation The wells were surveyed relative to the top of well <br /> ' MW-1, with an arbitrary elevation of 10 feet above mean sea level The relative ground water <br /> elevation data Is summarized In Table 1 <br /> Ground water flow direction In the area from the western UST was toward the northeast at a gradient <br /> of approximately 0 0016 (ft/ft) or 8 8 feet/mile The overall ground water flow direction at the site <br /> In the area of the western UST was directed toward the northwest <br /> The close proximity of the western UST area to the Stockton Deep Water channel may have a <br /> significant effect on the localized flow and gradient on the site Contoured ground water elevations <br /> Advanced CeoEn,.iron mental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.