My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2516
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540433
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2020 6:13:09 PM
Creation date
7/27/2020 4:08:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0540433
PE
2953
FACILITY_ID
FA0023104
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MANTECA POLICE FIRING RANGE
STREET_NUMBER
2516
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
24131044
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2516 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Frontier Transport • - 2 - • 28 December 2016 ~ <br /> 425 Larch Road <br /> Tracy, San Joaquin County <br /> 3. Please also include analysis for percent oxygen in the analytical suite for soil gas <br /> samples. Analysis of percent oxygen will aid in determining the presence of a <br /> bio-attenuation zone. <br /> 4. At a minimum, please collect at least one soil sample from each soil gas probe boring for <br /> laboratory analysis. Collection of soil data from these sample locations will aid in <br /> determining if a bio-attenuation zone is present at the Site. <br /> 5. Proposed well MW-30 should be moved due south of proposed well MW-29 and due <br /> west of existing well MW-28. Installation of proposed well MW-30 in this revised location <br /> will allow for lateral delineation to the west of MW-28. <br /> 6. The groundwater monitoring program detailed in the Addendum is acceptable. EMS <br /> proposes to perform quarterly to semi-annual groundwater monitoring of select wells. <br /> Groundwater samples are proposed to be analyzed for: TPH-G, BTEX, MTBE, DIPE, <br /> ETBE, TAME, TBA, 1,2-DCA, EDB, and naphthalene. The proposed sampling <br /> frequency of Site wells is as follows: <br /> Monitoring Well Sam ing Frequency <br /> Quarter) Semi-Annual first and thirdquarters) <br /> MW-1, MW-5, MW-17, MW-19 through MW-24, MW-2, MW-4, MW-8, MW-9 <br /> MW-27 through MW-31, DPE-3 <br /> The Fourth Quarter 2016 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report is due <br /> 1 February 2017. <br /> 7. EMS did not provide well construction details for the three (3) proposed wells in the <br /> Addendum, however in the Work Plan, groundwater monitoring wells were proposed to <br /> be screened from 5 to 20 ft logs. The well construction details proposed in the Work <br /> Plan are acceptable. <br /> 8. In my letter dated 25 October 2016, 1 requested a scope of work for vertical delineation. <br /> In the Addendum, EMS provided analytical data for the existing deeper screened wells, <br /> MW-12 through MW-16, and MW-18, screened from 30 to 40 feet below ground surface <br /> (ft bgs). Wells MW-12, and MW-14 through MW16 were destroyed in 2014, after several <br /> years of petroleum hydrocarbons not being detected in these wells. Based on a review <br /> of data from these wells, groundwater pollution at the Site appears to have been <br /> adequately delineated vertically and I rescind the request for this scope of work. <br /> 9. In the memo attached to the 16 November 2015 staff letter, in the 15 April 2016 staff <br /> letter, and in the 25 October 2016 staff letter, I requested that all future reports include a <br /> table with all well and boring construction information, including at a minimum: well or <br /> boring name, coordinates (latitude and longitude), elevation, total depth, well diameter, <br /> screen interval, and filter pack interval. Existing and destroyed wells should be included <br /> on this table. A well construction details table was not included in the Addendum. <br /> Inclusion of this information will aid review. This is my fourth request that a well <br /> construction details table be included in all future reports and work plans. Please assure <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.