Laserfiche WebLink
' GeologuaecFinus Inc Page 2 <br /> GW Monitonng Report <br /> ' Ted Peters-AST <br /> Project No 70I 2 <br /> . March 14,2001 <br /> correspondence In his letter, Mr Mello also included the requirement that the site's wells <br /> be monitored on a semi-annual basis starting with the first quarter of 2001 This report <br /> details the completion of the first semi-annual monitoring event performed on February 16, <br /> ' 2001 <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 2.1 Site Hydrology <br /> ' Site-specific groundwater gradients and bearings were calculated from the depth to water <br /> measurements taken during the event Two separate gradients were calculated for the three <br /> wells in the former UST location (MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3) and the three wells in the <br /> former AST location (MW-4, MW-5 and MW-6) Table 1 in Appendix A is a summary of <br /> water level elevations, gradient slopes and bearings Figure 2 is a groundwater gradient <br /> map for the site Historical groundwater direction and slope data are summarized in Figure <br /> ' 3 Groundwater Gradient Rose Diagram <br /> The average groundwater elevation of the AST wells was 13 83 feet above mean sea level <br /> The direction and gradient of groundwater in this area was N371E at 0 03 ft/ft As seen in <br /> Figure 3, the northeast direction is anomalous when compared to the southwesterly <br /> directions noted on July 30, 1999, and February 17, 2000 It is noted that free product was <br /> present in well MW-5, which may have resulted in a depressed water table level <br /> Nmeasurement in the well <br /> A gradient was also calculated from the three wells installed at the front of the site to <br /> ' investigate the UST area The gradient in this area was 0 001 ft/ft flowing N64°W This <br /> gradient is identical to the May 1, 2000 data recorded for the UST wells and similar to the <br /> other monitoring events <br /> ' This is the third event where groundwater elevations were measured in both sets of wells on <br /> the property Although it is not known why groundwater gradients are different in the two <br /> sets of wells, a possible explanation is that there are a large number of domestic wells west <br /> ' of the site that may influence the gradient at the site <br /> A domestic well survey within 2,000 feet of the site was completed on August 16, 2000 <br /> ' The survey efforts resulted in the identification of numerous domestic wells on the <br /> residential properties to the southwest, west and northwest of the site Ten wells were <br /> located in the properties to the immediate west of the subject site and their locations are <br /> identified in our "Well Receptor Report" dated September 11, 2000 (submitted to the SJC- <br /> ' PHS/EHD and the CRWQCB-CVR) <br /> 2.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> ' On February 16, 2001, Don Light of Del Tech Geotechnical Support arrived on-site, opened <br /> the wells, and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The <br /> ' water level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot During this monitoring event <br /> free product was noted in well MW-5 and an accurate reading of groundwater depth was not <br /> . obtained <br />