Laserfiche WebLink
s.. Mr.Jadi Singh <br /> Page 11 <br /> January 23,2003 <br /> `~ The items of discussion during the meeting were the proposed facility's use permit, Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Boards interest in the project, soil conditions, percolation rates, ground- <br /> water depth, estimate of average daily sewage flow rate, and treatment systems which operate <br /> and have been evaluated by the Heath Department. A MicroSepTec waste water treatment <br /> system is one type of an approved treatment system presently in use in San Joaquin County. <br /> Essentially,the major action item at the meeting was the establishment of an average daily <br /> sewage quantity for Phase 1 by reviewing water use records from similar facilities operated by <br /> +- Mr. Singh. The water meter use for the ARCO AM/PM in Patterson was discussed with Mr. <br /> Huggins over the telephone. After some discussion, Mr. Huggins indicated that 3,000 dor <br /> less would probably be an accepta ble nurnr. Mr. Huggins requested a report describing the <br /> `+ proposed project be prepared for his department's review. <br /> 8.0 SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM AND DISPOSAL FIELD AREA <br /> Currently in San Joaquin County, we understand that there are only a hand full of operating <br /> �. package treatment systems. Based on our conversations with the EHD, EHD staff are satisfied <br /> with the two MicroSepTec Systems currently operating. We have heard that there are some <br /> "issues"with some of the other types of systems. It is our offices opinion that the EHD may <br /> have some additional comfort if the proposed project were to use a MicroSepTec System though <br /> other types of systems such as Orenco and Seven H have been installed in the County as well. <br /> The sewage treatment system manufacturers can provide performance information regarding <br /> their systems. EHD has not provided any specific treatment levels or water quality goals for the <br /> project. A treatment level achieved by several example projects by MicroSepTec reduced <br /> constituents to <10 mg/L-N -+total nitrates, <10 mg/L CBOD5 and 10 mg/L TSS <br /> (http://www.rnicroseptec.com/images/pdfs/professionalengineerspresentation.pdf_). <br /> One potential option discussed for a sewage disposal system would be to install two 1,500 gpd <br /> MicroSepTec Systems in parallel which could potentially treat a total of 3,000 gpd waste water. <br /> To minimize the waste w_a u_disps d_fig14,the upper twofeet of reladv_ely slowly percolating <br /> soils could be r ed. Below the surface soils, the percolation rate was found to be less than 5 <br /> minutes per inch, as shown in Table 3. <br /> The EPA design manual for onsite wastewater treatment systems recommends 2,500 square feet <br /> of disposal area based on an application rate of 1.2 gpd/ft' and a percolation rate of 1 to 5 <br /> minutes per inch(see table 7-2, Page 214, EPA, 1980). The San Joaquin County Environmental <br /> Health Department Sewage Standards indicates that a filter bed area of 2,520 square feet should <br /> dpi RaD <br /> r s <br /> r,+ r <br /> � r <br /> • <br /> *sSOG� <br />